Tag: penalty u/s 271(1)(b)
ITAT deleted penalty 271(1)(b) and 271F as explanation of the assessee was ignored by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A). ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3663 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the appellant assessee had challenged the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless …
Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) quashed as notice u/s 142(1) issued but no finding was as to if it was served on assessee. ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 3613 (2023) (10) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming penalty u/s …
Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) can not be imposed when assessment order passed u/s 143(3) not best judgment assessment u/s 144 ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3417 (2020) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Akhil Bhartiya Prathmik Shikshak Sangh Bhawan Trust vs. ADIT 115 TTJ 419 (Del.) In …
When quantum additions deleted, penalty u/s 271(1)(b) not leviable for failure to comply with notices u/s 142(1). At best it could be technical & venial default on part of assessee ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3383 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Kabul …
Penalty 271(1)(b) deleted as assessee had furnished medical certificate of treatment for depression and AO did not bring anything against the evidences of ill-health. ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3354 (2020) (08) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming …
Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) deleted when assessment was framed u/s 143(3) proving that the assessee had cooperated in the assessment proceedings ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2972 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Pramila Kumari Vs DCIT (2011) 49 CCH 0401 In the instant …
No penalty u/s 271(1)(b) leviable in the case of change of counsel resulting in non compliance of notices- ITAT deleted penalty ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2603 (2018) (11) ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the revenue against the order of the CIT(A) in confirming penalty imposed …
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) when as per the assessment order, the assessee appeared time to time and explained return, furnished documents as requisitioned and case was heard and discussed – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2578 (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: …
Two penalty orders 271(1)(b) for the same default without issue of show cause. ITAT quashed penalty imposed before the issue of show cause notice ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2550 (2018) (10) ITAT The assessee had filed an appeal before the Tribunal against the order of CIT(A) arising …
Penalty for non filling consent form to enable tax authorities to obtain information from Swiss Banks – Supreme Court dismissed review Petition by asessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2525 (2018) 09 SC The assessee was served with a notice u/s 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 …