Aadhaar

No PAN invalidation for non linking with Aadhaar-SC Stays the provision. Read Full text of Supreme Court Judgment

No PAN invalidation for non linking with Aadhaar. Supreme Court stays provision for linking of PAN with Aadhaar

No PAN invalidation for non linking with Aadhaar-Supreme Court.

The The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has pronounced its judgment on the matter on the linking of Aadhaar to Income tax Permanent Account Number (PAN) as per newly inserted section 139AA of the Income tax Act, 1961.

The Court ruled as under:

(i) The Parliament was fully competent to enact Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and its authority to make this law was not diluted by the orders of the Court.

(ii) No  conflict was found between the provisions of Aadhaar Act and Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act inasmuch as when interpreted harmoniously, they operate in distinct fields.

(iii) Section 139AA of the Act is not discriminatory nor it offends equality clause enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution.

(iv) Section 139AA is also not violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution insofar as it mandates giving of Aadhaar enrollment number for applying PAN cards in the income tax returns or notified Aadhaar enrollment number to the designated authorities. Further, proviso to sub-section (2) thereof has to be read down to mean that it would operate only prospective.

(v) In view of the petition disputing challenging the provisios as violative of Article 21 of the Constitution which is pending before the Constitution Bench, there shall be a partial stay on the operation of proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 139AA which madates linking of aadhaar and invalidation of PAN otherwise.

Read Full Judgment of the Supreme Court on Aadhaar to PAN Linking Stay Click Here >>

However CBDT has again, post judgment clarified that from 1st July. 2017 Aadhaar is a must for filing income tax return as the Court has given only a partial relief regarding invalidation of PAN only.

Earlier, the hearing was completed on 4th May, 2017 in a batch of petitions filed before the Apex Court challenging the said section 139AA by which quoting Aadhaar in income tax returns has been made mandatory.

The main contentions of the petitioners was that such decision of the Government is contrary to the order of the Supreme Court and also He also is violative of Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.

It is notable that in August, 2015, a full Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court headed by Justice Chelameswar had ruled that it is not mandatory for a citizen to obtain Aadhaar Card.

On the other hand the Government was contending that the assuarnce given by it that no citizen shall be deprived of any benefit for want of Aadhaar was given before passing of  the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act..

However, today, the Hon’ble Court ruled that persons with PAN but not having Aadhaar Number can also file their Income tax Return and there shall be no invalidation of PAN for non linking of Aadhaar.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago