Bank

Anticipatory Bail granted to accused of using forged Income Tax Return for bank loan

Anticipatory bail granted to accused of using forged Income Tax Return (ITR) for taking bank loan

ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 3639 (2023) (01) HC

In the instant case, the accused applicant had moved application before the High Court for anticipatory bail. Allegation against the accused-applicant was that she had submitted forged income tax returns for obtaining loan amount the Bank.

However, the accused-applicant had repaid the entire amount along with interest and the bank issued ‘No Dues Certificate’ and no further amount was due to the Bank.

The Applicant had submitted that the co-accused of this case had been granted anticipatory bail by the High Court, therefore, on the basis of principles of parity the present applicant may also be granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of trial.

The High Court observed that only allegation against the accused-applicant was that she submitted forged income tax returns while obtaining the loan, no purpose would be served by arresting and sending the accused-applicant jail inasmuch as investigation had been completed and charge-sheet has already been filed.

The High Court ordered that the accused-applicant be enlarged on anticipatory bail till conclusion of trial. She was directed to appear before the trial Court concerned within one week from today. The accused-applicant was further directed to file a personal bond and two local and reliable sureties each amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

7 days ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago