Benami

Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions (Removal of Difficulties) Order 2018.

Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions (Removal of Difficulties) Order 2018. Reference to Initiating Officer, representation by other parties

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)
ORDER

New Delhi, the 9th October, 2018

INCOME-TAX

S.O.5194 (E).—Whereas, sub-section (1) of section 48 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,1988 (45 of 1988)(hereafter referred to as the said Act) provides that a person preferring an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal under said Act may either appear in person or take the assistance of an authorised representative of his choice to present his case before the Appellate Tribunal; sub-section (2) of section 48 of the said Act provides that the Central Government may authorise one or more of its officers to act as presenting officers on its behalf, and every person so authorised may present the case with respect to any appeal before the Appellate Tribunal; the Explanation to section 48 of the said Act defines the term “authorised representative” for the purposes of said section;

And, whereas, a difficulty has arisen in view of the fact that although, under sub-section (1) of section 48 of the said Act-

(i) the Initiating Officer, being a person preferring appeal to the Appellate Tribunal under the said Act, may either appear in person or take the assistance of an authorised representative, there is a need to remove the difficulty arising from the absence of specific reference of the Initiating Officer in sub-section (1) of section 48 of the said Act; and

(ii) provides for the representation before the Appellate Tribunal for the person preferring appeal, but does not provide for representation by the other parties to the proceedings before the Appellate Tribunal, there is a need to remove difficulty in respect of representation by the other parties to the proceedings before the Appellate Tribunal;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 70 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby makes the following Order to remove the aforesaid difficulties, namely:-

1. Short title and commencement.– (1) This Order may be called the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2018.

(2) It shall come into force from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In section 48 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, –

(A) in sub-section (1), for the words “A person preferring an appeal to”, the words “A person, including the Initiating Officer, who is a party to any proceedings before” shall be substituted;

(B) in the Explanation, –

(I) in the opening portion, for the words “means a person authorised by the appellant” the following shall be substituted, namely: – “in relation to –

(i) the Initiating Officer, means a person authorised by the Central Government;

(ii) any other party to the proceedings, means a person authorised by the party”;

(II) in clause (i) and (ii) for the words, “the appellant” wherever they occur, the words “the party” shall be substituted.

[F. No.370149/170/2018-TPL]
PRAVIN RAWAL, Director (TPL-II)

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Just because log book not maintained does not mean vehicles used for personal purposes

Just because log book was not maintained does not mean that vehicles were used for personal purposes by the Trustee…

1 hour ago
  • Income Tax

No addition can be made on grounds other than reasons to believe recorded u/s 148

Where belief of escapement of income as per reasons recorded fails no other addition can be made by the AO…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Date of dispatch of Speed Post of verified ITR-V relevant for determining 30 days period

Date of dispatch of Speed Post of duly verified ITR-V shall be considered for the purpose of determination of 30…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Cash deposit before giving unsecured loan-Addition in hands of loan creditor or receiver?

Cash deposited in bank before giving unsecured loan. The addition if at all can be made u/s 69A in the…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Limitation for filing Rectification Application u/s 254(2)starts from the date order is served

Limitation for filing Rectification Application to ITAT u/s 245(2) starts from the date when the order of which rectification is…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Only actual days of services to be considered in computing threshold for constitution of PE

Only days on which actual services rendered by company to be considered in computing threshold for constitution of permanent establishment…

2 days ago