Black Money

No prosecution under BMA for non-disclosure of assets (except immovable property) up to 20 Lakhs

No prosecution under Black Money Act for omission to disclose assets (other than immovable property) of value up to Rs. 20 Lakhs – CBDT Instruction

Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) had issued an Instruction vide F. No.285/46/2021/IT (lnv.V)/645 dated 15.03.2022 clarifying  that  prosecution under section 49 and/or 50 of Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act,2015 (“BMA, 2015”) shall not be initiated in cases where penalty under section 42 and/or 43 of the BMA, 2015 is not imposed or imposable, in relation to assets covered under the proviso to aforesaid sections i.e. an asset, being one or more bank accounts having an aggregate balance which does not exceed a value equivalent to Rs. 5 lakh at any time during the previous year.

The said instruction was aimed to protect individuals holding foreign accounts with minor balances that might not have been reported due to oversight or ignorance, by providing that non-disclosure of such accounts will not attract penalty or prosecution.

The Finance (No.2) Act. 2024 has substituted the proviso to section 42 and 43 of the BMA, 2015 w.e.f 01.10.2024 to provide that this section shall not apply in respect of an asset or assets (other than immovable property) where the aggregate value of such asset or assets does not exceed twenty lakh rupees.

The said amendment has expanded the scope of assets (not limited to bank accounts), which are not amenable to penalty provisions under section 42 and/or 43 of the BMA, 2015. However, the existing Instruction dated 15.03.2022 continues to provides protection from prosecution proceedings only in respect of foreign bank accounts.

In view of the above amendment, the CBDT, in order to provide relief from institution of prosecution proceedings under section 49 and/or 50 of BMA, 2015, in respect of asset(s) covered under the proviso to penalty provisions under section 42 and 43 of BMA. 2015, has amended the Instruction dated 15.03.2022.

Accordingly, in exercise of powers under section 84 of the BMA, 2015 read with section 119 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) the CBDT has amended Instruction dated 15.03.2022 to direct that prosecution proceedings under section 49 and/or 50 of BMA, 2015, would not be initiated in cases where penally under section 42 and/or 43 of the BMA, 2015 is not imposed or imposable in relation to assets covered under the proviso to aforesaid sections i.e an asset or assets (other than immovable property) where the aggregate value of such asset or assets does not exceed a value equivalent to Rs.20 lakh at any time during the relevant previous year.

Download CBDT Instruction dated 18.08.2025 Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

23 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

3 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

4 days ago