Black Money

No prosecution under BMA for non-disclosure of assets (except immovable property) up to 20 Lakhs

No prosecution under Black Money Act for omission to disclose assets (other than immovable property) of value up to Rs. 20 Lakhs – CBDT Instruction

Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) had issued an Instruction vide F. No.285/46/2021/IT (lnv.V)/645 dated 15.03.2022 clarifying  that  prosecution under section 49 and/or 50 of Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act,2015 (“BMA, 2015”) shall not be initiated in cases where penalty under section 42 and/or 43 of the BMA, 2015 is not imposed or imposable, in relation to assets covered under the proviso to aforesaid sections i.e. an asset, being one or more bank accounts having an aggregate balance which does not exceed a value equivalent to Rs. 5 lakh at any time during the previous year.

The said instruction was aimed to protect individuals holding foreign accounts with minor balances that might not have been reported due to oversight or ignorance, by providing that non-disclosure of such accounts will not attract penalty or prosecution.

The Finance (No.2) Act. 2024 has substituted the proviso to section 42 and 43 of the BMA, 2015 w.e.f 01.10.2024 to provide that this section shall not apply in respect of an asset or assets (other than immovable property) where the aggregate value of such asset or assets does not exceed twenty lakh rupees.

The said amendment has expanded the scope of assets (not limited to bank accounts), which are not amenable to penalty provisions under section 42 and/or 43 of the BMA, 2015. However, the existing Instruction dated 15.03.2022 continues to provides protection from prosecution proceedings only in respect of foreign bank accounts.

In view of the above amendment, the CBDT, in order to provide relief from institution of prosecution proceedings under section 49 and/or 50 of BMA, 2015, in respect of asset(s) covered under the proviso to penalty provisions under section 42 and 43 of BMA. 2015, has amended the Instruction dated 15.03.2022.

Accordingly, in exercise of powers under section 84 of the BMA, 2015 read with section 119 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) the CBDT has amended Instruction dated 15.03.2022 to direct that prosecution proceedings under section 49 and/or 50 of BMA, 2015, would not be initiated in cases where penally under section 42 and/or 43 of the BMA, 2015 is not imposed or imposable in relation to assets covered under the proviso to aforesaid sections i.e an asset or assets (other than immovable property) where the aggregate value of such asset or assets does not exceed a value equivalent to Rs.20 lakh at any time during the relevant previous year.

Download CBDT Instruction dated 18.08.2025 Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

After notice u/s 143(2) is issued, processing u/s 143(1) is not permissible

After notice u/s 143(2) is issued in scrutiny proceedings, summary processing u/s 143(1) is not permissible - ITAT In a…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Assessment Order without digital or manual signature is non-est and illegal

Assessment Order without digital or manual signature is non-est and illegal In a recent judgment, Delhi ITAT has held that…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Once ITR is filled in response to notice u/s 148 though late, notice u/s 143(2) is must – ITAT

Once assessee filed ITR, in response to the notice u/s 148 of the Act, even beyond time prescribed, Assessing Officer…

5 days ago
  • tender

Petitioner was not disqualified in tender for giving EMD by way of FD not DD

Petitioner was not disqualified in tender for submitting EMD by way of Fixed Deposit in place of Demand Draft -…

5 days ago
  • Bank

State Bank of India elects four Directors in its Central Board

State Bank of India in its General Meeting of the Shareholders elected four Directors to the Central Board. The meeting…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Declaration of additional income by increasing the WIP was not proper – ITAT

Voluntary declaration of additional income by increasing WIP was not proper, as assessee will take the additional benefit in the…

7 days ago