CBEC

CBEC invites comments on KYC to simplify verification norms post GST

CBEC invites comments on KYC to simplify verification norms post GST and in view of the emphasis of government on adoption of a unified identifier

Circular No. /2017-Customs

F.No.450/178/2015-CUS- IV
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise and Customs

Room No. 227B, North Block,
New Delhi, dated the November, 2017

To
All Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner of Customs /Custom (Preventive),
All Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Customs / Customs (Preventive),

Subject: – Know Your Customer (KYC) norms-regarding

Sir /Madam,

Kind reference is invited to Board’s Circular Nos. 07/2015-Customs dated 12.02.2015 and 13/2016-Customs dated 26.04.2016 on the subject cited above.

2. In line with the KYC norms stipulated by the Reserve Bank of India, Board had decided that two documents, one for proof of identity and other for proof of address are required for KYC verification. However, in case of individuals, if any one document listed in the Board Circular No. 9/2010-Cus dated 08.04.2010 contains both proof of identity and proof of addresses, the same would suffice for the purposes of KYC verification. Aadhaar card had also been recognised as one of the document for individuals. Board had further relaxed KYC norms for individual, in view of the problem being faced by individuals who possess proof of identity in the form of prescribed document but their address of present stay is not mentioned in the proof of identity. Moreover, many a times, it is difficult for individuals to produce present/current proof of address. For such cases, it was decided that proof of identity collected by the representative of the authorized courier at the time of delivery of such consignments to an individual consignee along with recording of address of the place where such consignments would be delivered to the consignee by the authorized courier companies, would suffice for KYC verification [Circular No. 13/2016-Customs dated 26.04.2016 refers]. In order to further simplify and clarify the procedure in this regard, Board has decided that in case of import or export through courier by an individual, Aadhaar card or passport or PAN or Driving License or Voter ID card shall suffice for KYC verification however recording of address of place of delivery, as mentioned above, would continue.

3. Board has also decided to simplify the norms for KYC verification in the light of introduction of Goods & Services Tax (GST) and in view of the emphasis of government on adoption of a unified identifier. Accordingly, in modification of the earlier instructions, in the case of import or export through courier by a firm, company, institution, registered under the GST laws, GSTIN shall suffice as the document for the purpose of KYC verification. In cases where the firm, company or institution is not registered under GST laws, Unique identification Number (UIN) or PAN shall serve as the document for KYC verification.

4. All jurisdictional Chief Commissioners are requested to circulate the above draft circular among officers and stakeholders for their comments.

Yours faithfully,
(Zubair Riaz)
Director (Customs)

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

8 hours ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

1 day ago
  • arbitration

Limitation u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commences on disposal of application u/s 33 by Arbitral Tribunal – SC

Limitation for filing application u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commence from date on which application u/s 33 is disposed of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Case remanded in absence of finding if disallowance u/s 40A(3) covered by Rule 6DD

Case remanded as no finding was given whether cash payments disallowed u/s 40A(3) were covered by Rule 6DD under Income…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

For investment in share capital, source of investment is outside the control of the investee company

In case of investment in share capital, the source of investment may remain outside the control of the investee company.…

7 days ago