CBEC

CBEC invites comments on KYC to simplify verification norms post GST

CBEC invites comments on KYC to simplify verification norms post GST and in view of the emphasis of government on adoption of a unified identifier

Circular No. /2017-Customs

F.No.450/178/2015-CUS- IV
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise and Customs

Room No. 227B, North Block,
New Delhi, dated the November, 2017

To
All Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner of Customs /Custom (Preventive),
All Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Customs / Customs (Preventive),

Subject: – Know Your Customer (KYC) norms-regarding

Sir /Madam,

Kind reference is invited to Board’s Circular Nos. 07/2015-Customs dated 12.02.2015 and 13/2016-Customs dated 26.04.2016 on the subject cited above.

2. In line with the KYC norms stipulated by the Reserve Bank of India, Board had decided that two documents, one for proof of identity and other for proof of address are required for KYC verification. However, in case of individuals, if any one document listed in the Board Circular No. 9/2010-Cus dated 08.04.2010 contains both proof of identity and proof of addresses, the same would suffice for the purposes of KYC verification. Aadhaar card had also been recognised as one of the document for individuals. Board had further relaxed KYC norms for individual, in view of the problem being faced by individuals who possess proof of identity in the form of prescribed document but their address of present stay is not mentioned in the proof of identity. Moreover, many a times, it is difficult for individuals to produce present/current proof of address. For such cases, it was decided that proof of identity collected by the representative of the authorized courier at the time of delivery of such consignments to an individual consignee along with recording of address of the place where such consignments would be delivered to the consignee by the authorized courier companies, would suffice for KYC verification [Circular No. 13/2016-Customs dated 26.04.2016 refers]. In order to further simplify and clarify the procedure in this regard, Board has decided that in case of import or export through courier by an individual, Aadhaar card or passport or PAN or Driving License or Voter ID card shall suffice for KYC verification however recording of address of place of delivery, as mentioned above, would continue.

3. Board has also decided to simplify the norms for KYC verification in the light of introduction of Goods & Services Tax (GST) and in view of the emphasis of government on adoption of a unified identifier. Accordingly, in modification of the earlier instructions, in the case of import or export through courier by a firm, company, institution, registered under the GST laws, GSTIN shall suffice as the document for the purpose of KYC verification. In cases where the firm, company or institution is not registered under GST laws, Unique identification Number (UIN) or PAN shall serve as the document for KYC verification.

4. All jurisdictional Chief Commissioners are requested to circulate the above draft circular among officers and stakeholders for their comments.

Yours faithfully,
(Zubair Riaz)
Director (Customs)

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

8 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

17 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

17 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

2 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

3 days ago