CBEC

Settle mismatched IGST refunds on a priority basis, focus on recoverable arrears-CBEC Chief

Settle mismatched IGST refunds focus on recoverable arrears. CBEC Chief admits that number of IGST refunds are stuck due to invoice/other mismatch

The Chairman, Central Board of Excise and Customs in its latest communication dated 23rd February, 2018 inter alia acknowledged that number of IGST refunds are stuck due to invoice mismatch and other mismatches.

According to the letter, an interface has been developed in ICES where Customs officers can process refund claims and sanction refund. The CBEC Chief has requested all the concerned Chief Commissioners to ensure that all pending refund claims arising due to invoice mismatch or other mismatch which need rectification are processed and settled on a priority basis.

It has been advised that detailed Circular No. 5/2018 dated 23rd February, 2018 issued by the Board on the subject of Refund of IGST on Export– Invoice mis-match Cases-Alternative Mechanism with Officer Interface may be studied for taking further necessary action.

Also, the CBEC Chairman has drawn attention to the recovery of arrears as an area of concern requiring immediate attention. All Chief Commissioners have been asked to to focus on arrears that are not locked in litigation and are clearly recoverable.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

3 days ago
  • GST

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

6 days ago