Competition Commission of India

Competition Commission of India has imposed penalty on six firms for bid rigging

Competition Commission of India has passed imposing penalty on six firms for bid rigging in five tenders floated by Pune Municipal Corporation 

Lesser Penalty Provisions aid CCI to bust cartel in tenders of Pune Municipal Corporation 

As per Press Release of MCA, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) has passed final order imposing penalty on the following six firms for bid rigging  

Fortified Security Solutions (Fortified)
Ecoman Enviro Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Ecoman)
Lahs Green India Pvt. Ltd. (Lahs Green),
Sanjay Agencies,
Mahalaxmi Steels ( Mahalakshmi) and
Raghunath Industry Pvt. Ltd. (Raghunath) 

The Penalty has been imposed for bid rigging/ collusion in five tenders floated by Pune Municipal Corporation during the period December 2014 to March 2015 for “Design, Supply, Installation, Commissioning, Operation and Maintenance of Municipal Organic and Inorganic Solid Waste Processing Plant(s)”. 

Under the provisions of Section 46 of the Competition Act, 2002 (‘the Act’) read with the Competition Commission of India (Lesser Penalty) Regulations, 2009 (‘Lesser Penalty Regulations’) CCI reduced penalty on four bidders i.e. Mahalakshmi, Lahs Green, Sanjay Agencies and Ecoman.

The case against these firms was initiated on the basis of an information filed under Section 19(1)(a) of the Act by Nagrik Chetna Manch. During investigation, all six firms approached CCI as lesser penalty applicants. 

From the evidence gathered during the investigation, CCI found that there was bid rigging/ collusive bidding in the Tender nos. 34, 35, 44, 62 and 63 of 2014 for ‘Design, Supply, Installation, Commissioning, Operation and Maintenance of Municipal Organic and Inorganic Solid Waste Processing Plant(s)’ in contravention of Section 3(3)(d) read with Section 3(1) of the Act. Further, CCI also found meeting of mind and co-ordination between various individuals which included the proprietor/ partner/ director of the firms to rig the tenders by way of submitting proxy/ cover bids.

Considering contravention of provisions of the Act, an amount of INR 13.07 Lakhs, INR 45.20 Lakhs, INR 42 Lakhs, INR 1.51 Crores, INR 3.36 Crores and INR 30.55 Lakhs was computed as leviable penalty on six firms namely Fortified, Ecoman, Lahs Green, Sanjay Agencies, Mahalakshmi and Raghunath, respectively, in terms of Section 27 (b) of the Act. CCI imposed penalty on firms at the rate of 10 percent of their profit for the years 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15 i.e. three years preceding the year in which collusion took place. Additionally, considering totality of facts and circumstances of the case, penalty leviable on individual officials of four firms namely Ecoman, Lahs Green, Sanjay Agencies and Raghunath was computed at the rate of 10 percent of their average income for the same three years. No penalty was imposed on individuals of Fortified and Mahalakshmi as these are proprietorship firms.

Keeping in view the modus operandi of the cartel, the stage at which the lesser penalty application was filed, the evidences gathered by the DG independent of Lesser Penalty Application and co-operation extended in conjunction with the value addition provided in establishing the existence of cartel, CCI granted Mahalaksmi and Lahs Green and their individuals 50 percent reduction in penalty than otherwise leviable on them. Sanjay Agencies and Ecoman, along with their individuals, were granted 40 and 25 percent reduction in penalty respectively. Pursuant to reduction, penalty imposed on Mahalkshmi was INR 1.68 crore, on Lahs Green was INR 21 Lakh, on Sanjay Agencies was INR 90.64 Lakh and on Ecoman was INR 33.90 Lakhs.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

CBDT specifies work allocations and zonal charges of its members

CBDT specifies work allocations and zonal charges of its members CBDT has issued an office memorandum dated 03/12/2025 giving details…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO can’t make addition on his speculation and assumption of manipulation in share prices

Addition quashed as alleged manipulation in share prices was merely a speculation and assumption of Assessing Office In a recent…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Assesee not deducting TDS due to stay by High Court can’t be treated as assessee in default

When assesee did not deduct TDS on account of interim stay of High Court, it can’t be regarded as assessee…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271B is not attracted where books of account not maintained – ITAT Allahabad

Penalty u/s 271B is not attracted in a case where books of account have not been maintained In a recent…

1 day ago
  • Empanelment

NALCO invites RFP for empanelment of CA Firms for verification of Stores/Spares & movable assets

NALCO invites RFP for empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for verification of Stores/Spares and movable assets.  NALCO has invited Request…

1 day ago
  • RBI

Sending or bringing currency of Nepal and Bhutan – RBI revises regulations

Sending or bringing currency of Nepal and Bhutan - RBI revises exiting regulations  RBI has notified the Foreign Exchange Management…

1 day ago