Chartered Accountants

CBEC calls names of CAs not cooperating with the Department in in filing GST TRAN-1 data

CBEC calls names of CAs not cooperating with the Department in filing GST TRAN-1 data. Is it true that the Government/Bureaucracy considers CAs as Govt. Servant? 

Overly frustrated with the non co-operating  clients not turning up in due time with proper data and documents, now Taxman may be knocking at their doors asking for reasons for allegedly not co-operating with assesses in filing  GST TRAN-1 data.

A letter dated 5th December, 2017, purportedly issued by Shri John  Joseph, Special Secretary & Member, CBEC (hereinafter “the Bureaucrat”) raises some serious concern for the professionals.

As per the said letter, one of the standard excuse raised by the assessees before the respective GST officials is that they have directed their chartered accountant (CA) but the work is getting delayed due to the CA being out of station.

Interestingly, the said letter goes on to opine that the chartered accountants may not be going on leave for a long in the month of December due to their occupation in filing Income Tax Returns. Therefore it asks officials to contact CAs to collect the data.

The letter travels even farther and asks for submission of the name of the chartered accountants who not cooperating with the Department along with the name of companies being handled by them.

First of all, December is no more a sacred tax month. And to this extent, the Bureaucrat seems to be flawed in his observation. Secondly, the use of the term “CA’s who not cooperating with the Department” is something that sounds amiss. The real intention for the choice of such word though rests with the Bureaucrat, however it could not be more emphasised that CAs are neither the agent of the Government or Government servant drawing salary from the exchequer.

Please re-tweet/share and like the tweet and vote to know more opinions

As said, the actual background of asking the names of CA along with his companies lies with the Bureaucrat and it could be for getting connecting with the CAs for knowing the real issue and resolving the hold.

But equally, it could not be denied that CAs are being viewed as  the one “not cooperating with the Department” for which I would say, CAs, to a large extent are themselves responsible for creating such impressions.

Whether it is Income Tax or GST, by repeatedly making representations and asking for extension , I think, CAs have themselves created an impression that they are Government Servant and not professionals whose role is limited to facilitating the initiatives of the Government and the responsibility or the compliance part is the sole responsibility of the assesses only. More importantly, the responsibility for providing hassle free platform and technical support is that of the Government only.

It is high time that all professionals should realise this fact else, days are not far when they will be caught between ever “non-co-operating assessee” and the Bureaucracy.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Tax Audit Report Form 3CD deleted by ITAT

Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Form 3CD related to details regarding turnover, gross profit etc. for previous…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Merely ex-parte rectifying computation without amending assessment order not make it nullity- ITAT

Merely rectifying computation without amending assessment order without notice to assessee does not nullify the entire assessment  - ITAT In…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Once assessee discharges primary onus, it shifts to AO to bring evidence to contrary – ITAT

Once assessee discharges primary onus of providing basic documents in support of the identity, genuineness and the creditworthiness it shifts…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cost Inflation Index for FY/Tax Year 2026-27 notified by CBDT. See Up-to-date Table of CII

CBDT has notified Cost Inflation Index for Financial Year / Tax Year 2026-27 CBDT has notified "384" as Cost Inflation…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Power of CIT(A) u/s 251(1)(a) to remand case can be exercised only in best judgment assessment

Power of CIT(A) under section 251(1)(a) to remand case could be exercised only when the assessment is passed u/s 144…

6 days ago
  • ICAI

ICAI (Global Networking) Guidelines, 2025 kept in abeyance

ICAI (Global Networking) Guidelines, 2025 kept in abeyance In February 2026, ICAI had issued ICAI (Global Networking) Guidelines 2025 to…

7 days ago