Chartered Accountants

Kerala High Court stayed disciplinary proceedings for conducting tax audit in excess of limits prescribed by ICAI Guidelines

The Kerala High Court has stayed disciplinary proceedings for conducting tax audit in excess of limits prescribed by ICAI Guidelines for member chartered accountants from time to time

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Present:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

Wednesday, the 3rd day of August 2016/12th Sravana, 1938

WP(C) .No.25662/2016(G)

PETITIONER/

SHAJI POULOSE, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT,
MEMBERSHIP NUMBER 022909, U.P COMPLEX, PERINTHALMANNA,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA 679 322.

RESPONDENTS/

  1. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA
    THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA,
    ICAI .BHAVAN, INDRAPRASTHA MARG,NEW DELHI 110 002.
  2. PRESIDENT, INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA
    THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA,
    ICAI .BHAVAN, INDRAPRASTHA MARG,NEW DELHI 110 002.
  3. DISCIPLINARY DIRECTORATE, THE INSTIUTUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
    OF INDIA, P.B NO 7100,ICAI BHAVAN, INDRAPRASTHA MARG, NEW DELHI 110 002,
    REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
  1. THE CHAIRMAN, DIRECT TAXES COMMITTEE,ICAI BHAVAN, INDRAPRASTHA MARG,
    P.B NO 7100, NEW DELHI 110 002.

Writ Petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be pleased to direct the highest body of the respondents to consider and pass orders on Ext P5 representation within a time frame, after hearing the petitioner and stay all further proceedings pursuant to Exts. P3, P7 and P9, till a decision is taken on Exts. P5 and is effectively communicated to the petitioner, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

This petition coming on for admission upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and upon hearing the arguments of SRI. K. ANAND, Senior Advocate along with M/S. LATHA ANAND, M. N. RADHAKRISHNA MENON, JOSEPH SEBASTIAN PARACKAL, Advocates for the petitioner, the court passed the following:

ORDER

Admit.

Issue notice to the respondents.

Further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P3 will stand stayed.

03-08-2016                                                                                                                     Sd/- P. B. SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE

                    /true copy/

                                                                                                                                                              Sd/ 

                                                                                                                                           ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 20-03-2015 ALONG WITH ANNEXURES
EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 10-07-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE PRESIDENT
EXT. P7: TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM THE DISCIPLINARY DIRECTORATE OF ICAI DATED 23-06-2016
EXT. P9: TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 13-07-2016 OF ICAI

Download Full order Click Here >>

 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

5 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago