Companies Act

Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel Amendment Rules 2016. No Return MR-1 for CFO CS CEO. Exemption to Listed Companies & Board Disclosures

Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi,  30th June, 2016

G.S.R. .-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel)  Rules, 2014, namely:-

1 (1) These rules may  be  called  the Companies (Appointment  and  Remuneration  of Managerial Personnel) Amendment Rules, 2016.

(2) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, (hereinafter referred to as the principal rules),-

(i) in rule 3, the expression “Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Company Secretary and Chief Financial Officer (CFO)” shall be omitted.

3. in rule 5 of the principal rules,-

(a) in sub-rule (1), “clauses (v), (vi), (vii) and (ix) to (xi)” shall be
(b) in sub-rule (2),-

(a) for the words ” the name of every employee of the company, who-“, the words ” the names of the top ten employees in terms of remuneration drawn and the name of every employee, who-” shall be substituted;

(b) in sub-clause (i) for the words “sixty lakh rupees”, the words “one crore and two lakh rupees” shall be substituted;

(c) in sub-clause (ii)  for the words “five l akh rupees per month “, the words ” eight lakh and fifty thousand rupees per month ” shall be substituted;

4. For Form MR-1 of the principal rules, the following form shall be substituted, namely .-

Form No. MR-1

[F. No. 1/5/2013-CL-V]
AMARDEEP SING  BHATIA, Jt. Secy

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

ITAT allows exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees

ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification. In…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases passed by the NFAC or the JAO

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases irrespective of the fact that the relevant assessment was completed physical…

1 day ago
  • Insurance

Appellate court interfering with MACT finding must undertake reappreciation of evidence

Appellate court interfering with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal findings on assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity must undertake…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When delay is not huge & involves huge monetary liability, lenient approach to be taken

When period of delay is not very huge and involve huge monetary liability on the assessee, a lenient approach should…

2 days ago
  • SEBI

EoGM of company can not ratify diversion of fund raised by preferential issue – SC

Ratification by EoGM of the company can not give legality of the diversion of the fund raised by preferential issue.…

3 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

Return of export cargo from Hormuz Strait where vessel do not lands at original port

CBIC prescribes procedures for return of export cargo from international waters due to closure of the Strait of Hormuz where…

3 days ago