Companies Act

Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel Amendment Rules 2016. No Return MR-1 for CFO CS CEO. Exemption to Listed Companies & Board Disclosures

Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi,  30th June, 2016

G.S.R. .-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel)  Rules, 2014, namely:-

1 (1) These rules may  be  called  the Companies (Appointment  and  Remuneration  of Managerial Personnel) Amendment Rules, 2016.

(2) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, (hereinafter referred to as the principal rules),-

(i) in rule 3, the expression “Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Company Secretary and Chief Financial Officer (CFO)” shall be omitted.

3. in rule 5 of the principal rules,-

(a) in sub-rule (1), “clauses (v), (vi), (vii) and (ix) to (xi)” shall be
(b) in sub-rule (2),-

(a) for the words ” the name of every employee of the company, who-“, the words ” the names of the top ten employees in terms of remuneration drawn and the name of every employee, who-” shall be substituted;

(b) in sub-clause (i) for the words “sixty lakh rupees”, the words “one crore and two lakh rupees” shall be substituted;

(c) in sub-clause (ii)  for the words “five l akh rupees per month “, the words ” eight lakh and fifty thousand rupees per month ” shall be substituted;

4. For Form MR-1 of the principal rules, the following form shall be substituted, namely .-

Form No. MR-1

[F. No. 1/5/2013-CL-V]
AMARDEEP SING  BHATIA, Jt. Secy

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

31 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

4 days ago
  • GST

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

7 days ago