Companies Act

Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel Amendment Rules 2016. No Return MR-1 for CFO CS CEO. Exemption to Listed Companies & Board Disclosures

Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi,  30th June, 2016

G.S.R. .-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel)  Rules, 2014, namely:-

1 (1) These rules may  be  called  the Companies (Appointment  and  Remuneration  of Managerial Personnel) Amendment Rules, 2016.

(2) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, (hereinafter referred to as the principal rules),-

(i) in rule 3, the expression “Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Company Secretary and Chief Financial Officer (CFO)” shall be omitted.

3. in rule 5 of the principal rules,-

(a) in sub-rule (1), “clauses (v), (vi), (vii) and (ix) to (xi)” shall be
(b) in sub-rule (2),-

(a) for the words ” the name of every employee of the company, who-“, the words ” the names of the top ten employees in terms of remuneration drawn and the name of every employee, who-” shall be substituted;

(b) in sub-clause (i) for the words “sixty lakh rupees”, the words “one crore and two lakh rupees” shall be substituted;

(c) in sub-clause (ii)  for the words “five l akh rupees per month “, the words ” eight lakh and fifty thousand rupees per month ” shall be substituted;

4. For Form MR-1 of the principal rules, the following form shall be substituted, namely .-

Form No. MR-1

[F. No. 1/5/2013-CL-V]
AMARDEEP SING  BHATIA, Jt. Secy

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC

Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus

Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…

2 days ago
  • ITAT

Application though named as rectification but if tax is not legitimate, it also touches merit: HC

Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of FMV

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of current FMV to be further…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

AO was directed to serve notice of hearing through physical mode upon assessee 

ITAT directed AO to serve notice of hearing both through electronic and physical mode upon the assessee  In a recent…

2 days ago