Companies Act

Auditor firm to be liable for fraudulent act of partners-MCA amends Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014

Auditor firm to be liable for fraudulent act of partners-MCA amends Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, Rule 10A for reporting existence of adequate internal financial controls systems diluted

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

Notification

New Delhi, the 7th May, 2018

G.S.R. ….(E)- In exercise of the powers conferred by sections 139, 143, 147 and 148 read with sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, namely:-

1. Short title and commencement.-

(1) These rules may be called the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Amendment Rules, 2018.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication  in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as the principal rules), in rule 3,-

(a) Explanation shall be omitted;

(b) proviso to sub-rule (7) shall be omitted.

3. In the principal rules, rule 9 shall be omitted

4. In the principal rules, in rule 10A, for the words “adequate internal financial controls system”, the words “internal financial controls with reference to financial statements” shall be substituted.

5. In the principal rules, in rule 14,-

(a) in clause (a), in sub-clause (i), for the words, “who is a cost accountant in practice”, the words “who is a cost accountant” shall be substituted;

(b) in clause (b) for the words “who is a cost accountant in practice”, the words “who is a cost accountant” shall be substituted.

[F. No. 1/33/2013.CL-V(Part)]

K.V.R. Murty, Jt. Secy.

Note: The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 246(E), dated the 31st March, 2014 and subsequently amended  as follows:-

  1. G.S.R. 722 (E) dated the 14th October, 2014;
  2. G.S.R. 972 (E) dated the 14th December, 2015;
  3. G.S.R. 307(E) dated the 30th March, 2017;
  4. G.S.R. 621(E) dated the 22nd June, 2017; and
  5. G.S.R. 174(E) dated the 16th February, 2018.

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago