Companies Act

Board meeting through video conferencing by any director possible where physical quorum is present-MCA

Board meeting through video conferencing/audio-visuals by any director possible where physical quorum is present-MCA

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

Notification

New Delhi , 7th May, 2018

G.S.R.            (E).In exercise of the powers conferred by sections 173, 177, 178 and section 186 read with section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, namely:-

1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Amendment Rules, 2018.

     (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication  in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as the principal rules), in rule 4, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-

“Provided that where there is quorum in a meeting through physical presence of directors, any other director may participate through video conferencing or other audio visual means.”.

3. In the principal rules, in rule 6, for the words “every listed company”, the words “every listed public company” shall be substituted.

4. In the principal rules, for rule 13, the following rule shall be  substituted, namely:-

“13. Special Resolution .- A resolution passed at a general meeting in terms of sub-section (3) of section 186 to give any loan or guarantee or investment or providing any security or the acquisition under sub-section (2) of section 186 shall specify the total amount up to which the Board of Directors are authorised to give such loan or guarantee, to provide such security or make such acquisition:

Provided that the company shall disclose to the members in the financial statement the full particulars in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (4) of section 186.

[F. No. 1/32/2013-CL-V-Part]

(K.V.R. Murty)
Joint Secretary to the Government of India

Note.- The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary,  Part  II,  Section  3,  Sub-section (i),  vide notification  number G.S.R.  240(E),  dated  the  31st  March,  2014  and  subsequently  amended  as follows:-

  1. G.S.R. 398 (E) dated the 12th June, 2014;
  2. G.S.R. 590 (E) dated the 14th August, 2014;
  3. G.S.R. 206 (E) dated the 18th March, 2015;
  4. G.S.R. 971(E) dated the 14th December, 2015;
  5. G.S.R. 309 (E) dated the 30th March, 2017; and
  6. G.S.R. 880 (E) dated the 13th July, 2017

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago