Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Sixth Amendment Rules, 2018. Consequential amendment to Rule 12A for DIN3 KYC late Fee
[To be published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub Section (i)l
Government of India
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
Notification
New Delhi, 20th September,2018
G.S.R. (E).-In exercise of the powers conferred under second proviso to sub-section (1), sub-section (4), sub-section (6) of section 149, sub-section (3) and (4) of section 150, section 151, sub-section (5) of section 152, section 153, section 154, section 157, section 160, sub-section (1) of section 168 of and section 170 read with section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014. namely: –
1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Sixth Amendment Rules, 2018.
(2) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2. In the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014,
(i) in the proviso to rule 12A, for the words and figures “before 15th September, 2018,” the words and figures “before 5th October, 2018 ” shall be substituted.
[F. No. 01/22/2013 CL-V (Pt-III)]
K.V.R.Murty Joint Secretary
Note: The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i)vide number G.S.R. 259(E) dated 31st March, 2014 and subsequently amended vide the following notifications:-
| Serial Number | Notification No. | Notification Date |
| 7 | G.S.R.616 [E) | 05-07-2018 |
| 8 | G.S.R.797 [E) | 21-08-2078 |
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…