Companies Act

Issue of securities in demat form not apply to Nidhi, Govt Co. or wholly owned subsidiary 

Issue of securities in dematerialised form not to apply to Nidhi Government company or wholly owned subsidiary. 

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 22nd January, 2019

G.S.R. 43(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 26, sub-section (1) of section 27, section 28, section 29, sub-section (2) of section 31, sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 39, sub-section (6) of section 40 and section 42 read with section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, namely:—

1. Short title and commencement.—(1) These rules may be called the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Amendment Rules, 2019.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their notification in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, in rule 9A, after sub-rule (10), the following shall be inserted, namely:—

“(11) This rule shall not apply to an unlisted public company which is:—

(a) a Nidhi;

(b) a Government company or

(c) a wholly owned subsidiary.”.

[F. No. 1/21/2013-CL-V-part]

K. V. R. MURTY, Jt. Secy.

Note : The Principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide notification number G.S.R. 251(E), dated the 31st March, 2014 and were subsequently amended:—
(1) Vide notification number G.S.R. 424(E), dated the 30th June, 2014;
(2) Vide notification number G.S.R. 430 (E) dated the 7th May, 2018;
(3) Vide notification number G.S.R. 752 (E) dated the 7th August, 2018; and
(4) Vide notification number G.S.R. 853 (E) dated 10th September, 2018.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

3 days ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

5 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

6 days ago