Companies Act

Issue of securities in demat form not apply to Nidhi, Govt Co. or wholly owned subsidiary 

Issue of securities in dematerialised form not to apply to Nidhi Government company or wholly owned subsidiary. 

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 22nd January, 2019

G.S.R. 43(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 26, sub-section (1) of section 27, section 28, section 29, sub-section (2) of section 31, sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 39, sub-section (6) of section 40 and section 42 read with section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, namely:—

1. Short title and commencement.—(1) These rules may be called the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Amendment Rules, 2019.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their notification in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, in rule 9A, after sub-rule (10), the following shall be inserted, namely:—

“(11) This rule shall not apply to an unlisted public company which is:—

(a) a Nidhi;

(b) a Government company or

(c) a wholly owned subsidiary.”.

[F. No. 1/21/2013-CL-V-part]

K. V. R. MURTY, Jt. Secy.

Note : The Principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide notification number G.S.R. 251(E), dated the 31st March, 2014 and were subsequently amended:—
(1) Vide notification number G.S.R. 424(E), dated the 30th June, 2014;
(2) Vide notification number G.S.R. 430 (E) dated the 7th May, 2018;
(3) Vide notification number G.S.R. 752 (E) dated the 7th August, 2018; and
(4) Vide notification number G.S.R. 853 (E) dated 10th September, 2018.

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

Supreme Court declines to entertain SLP due to constitution of the GST Appellate Tribunal 

Supreme Court declines to entertain SLP due to constitution of the GST Appellate Tribunal  In a recent judgment, Hon'ble Supreme…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

After notice u/s 143(2) is issued, processing u/s 143(1) is not permissible

After notice u/s 143(2) is issued in scrutiny proceedings, summary processing u/s 143(1) is not permissible - ITAT In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Assessment Order without digital or manual signature is non-est and illegal

Assessment Order without digital or manual signature is non-est and illegal In a recent judgment, Delhi ITAT has held that…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Once ITR is filled in response to notice u/s 148 though late, notice u/s 143(2) is must – ITAT

Once assessee filed ITR, in response to the notice u/s 148 of the Act, even beyond time prescribed, Assessing Officer…

5 days ago
  • tender

Petitioner was not disqualified in tender for giving EMD by way of FD not DD

Petitioner was not disqualified in tender for submitting EMD by way of Fixed Deposit in place of Demand Draft -…

5 days ago
  • Bank

State Bank of India elects four Directors in its Central Board

State Bank of India in its General Meeting of the Shareholders elected four Directors to the Central Board. The meeting…

6 days ago