Companies Act

Companies Removal of Names from Register of Companies) 2nd Amendment Rules, 2022

The Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Second Amendment Rules, 2022.
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
NOTIFICATION
 
New Delhi, the 24th August, 2022
 
G.S.R. 658(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1), (2) and (4) of section 248 read with section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016 , namely:-
 
1. Short title and commencement.- (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Second Amendment Rules, 2022.
 
(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
 
2. In the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016, –
 
(a) in Form No. STK-1, in paragraph (1), for the brackets and words “(tick whichever is applicable)” , the following shall be substituted, namely:-
 
“ the company is not carrying on any business or operations, as revealed after the physical verification carried out under sub-section (9) of section 12.
 
(tick whichever is applicable)”;
 
(b) in Form STK-5, in paragraph 1, after sub-paragraph (iii) and before the long line, the following shall be inserted, namely:-
 
“(iv) the following companies are not carrying on any business or operations, as revealed after the physical verification carried out under sub-section (9) of section 12.
 
M/s. ______________________________ (indicate names of companies)
M/s. ______________________________”;

 

 
(c) in Form No. STK-5A, in paragraph 1, for the brackets and words “[Strike off whichever is not applicable]”, the following shall be substituted, namely:-
 
“(iv) are not carrying on any business or operations, as revealed after the physical verification carried out under sub-section (9) of section 12. [Strike off whichever is not applicable]”.
 
[F.No.1/28/2013-CL-V(Part-III)]
MANOJ PANDEY, Jt. Secy.
 
Note :The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3 of Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 1174(E), dated the 26th December, 2016 and amended, vide notification numbers G.S.R 355(E), dated the 12th April, 2017 , G.S.R 350(E) dated the 8thMay, 2019, G.S.R 420(E), dated the 29th June, 2020 and G.S.R. 436(E), dated the 9th June, 2022.

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

GST Advisory & FAQs on Electronic Credit Reversal & Re-claimed Statement & RCM Liability

GSTN Advisory & FAQs related to Electronic Credit Reversal and Re-claimed Statement and RCM Liability/ITC Statement To ensure correct and…

19 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

Negligence of tax payer would not make exempt income taxable – ITAT

It is well settled that if any receipt cannot be subjected to tax being exempt under law, negligence of any…

10 hours ago
  • GST

For a notice sent by GSTN Portal no inference may be drawn as to its actual service

Since UPGST Authorities unable to inform when notice sent by GSTN Portal may have been retrieved or downloaded, no inference…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Cash deposit of Rs. 250000 cr (credit) misread as crores by AO – Plea declined

High Court declines plea of assessee that Income Tax Department wrongly read amount of cash deposit of Rs. 250000 Cr…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Discontinuance of business of firm will not vest ownership of firm’s property with partners

Discontinuance of business of partnership firm will not result in vesting ownership of firm's property with individual partners for capital…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Release of seized jewellery/gold u/s 132B within 120 days is directory not mandatory

Stipulation of 120 days for release of seized jewellery/gold u/s 132B is directory not mandatory – Delhi High Court In…

2 days ago