Companies Act

Designated Special Courts List us 435 Companies Act 2013 for trial of offences punishable with imprisonment of two years or more-MCA Notification

Designated Special Courts List us 435 Companies Act 2013 for trial of offences punishable with imprisonment of two years or more-MCA Notification 

Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs
Notification

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016

S.O………(E) In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 435 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby, after obtaining the concurrence of the respective Chief Justices of the High Courts, designates the following Courts mentioned in the Table below as Special Courts for the purposes of trial of offences punishable under the Companies Act, 2013 with imprisonment of two years or more in terms of section 435 of the Companies Act, 2013, namely:-

TABLE

Sl No. (1) Existing Court (2) Jurisdiction as Special Court (3)
1 Court of Additional Special Judge, Anti-Corruption at Jammu and Srinagar State of Jammu and Kashmir
2 Presiding Officers of Court No’s. 37 and 58 of the City Civil and Sessions Court, Greater Mumbai State of Maharastra
3 Court of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Union territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli at Silvassa Union Territories of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu
4 Court of District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge, Panji State of Goa
5 Court of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural), situated at Mirzapur, Ahmedabad State of Gujarat
6 9th Additional Session Judge, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh State of Madhya Pradesh
7 Court of Additional District and Session Judge, Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar Islands Union territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands
8 2nd Special Court, Calcutta State of West Bengal

 2. The aforesaid Courts mentioned in column number (2) shall exercise the jurisdiction as Special Courts in respect of jurisdiction mentioned in column number (3).

[ F No. 01/12/2009-CL-I (Vol. IV) ]

AMARDEEP SINGH BHATIA
Jt. Secy

Share

Recent Posts

  • huf

When testator was illiterate, burden was on propounder of Will to satisfy judicial conscience of Court

If judicial conscience of a final court of fact is not satisfied about the valid execution of the Will, it…

8 hours ago
  • Insurance

Which ITRS are relevant for assessing income of deceased person under MV Act 1988

SC laid downs guidelines for use of ITRS for assessing annual income of deceased person under Motor Vehicles Act 1988…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT condones delay in filing Form No. 10AB

CBDT condones delay in filing Form No. 10AB furnished electronically between 01.10.2025 to 31.03.2026. CBDT has condoned the delay in…

4 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC express concern over AI generated judgments/paragraphs escaping scrutiny by NCLT/NCLAT

Supreme Court expresses serious concerns over AI generated judgments/paragraphs relied upon by the NCLT/NCLAT In a recent judgment, the Hon'ble…

4 days ago
  • ICAI

ICAI to take disciplinary action for quoting very low & incommensurate fee by Chartered Accountants

ICAI to take disciplinary action for quoting very low and incommensurate fee by Chartered Accountants As per the announcement made…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU Version 6.00 and FVU 9.5 RPU V 1.0 from Tax Year 2026-27 – Download

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU Version 6.0 from FY 2007-08 NSDL has revised the e-TDS TCS RPU utility for preparing…

4 days ago