Designated Special Courts List us 435 Companies Act 2013 for trial of offences punishable with imprisonment of two years or more-MCA Notification
Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs
Notification
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016
S.O………(E) In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 435 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby, after obtaining the concurrence of the respective Chief Justices of the High Courts, designates the following Courts mentioned in the Table below as Special Courts for the purposes of trial of offences punishable under the Companies Act, 2013 with imprisonment of two years or more in terms of section 435 of the Companies Act, 2013, namely:-
TABLE
| Sl No. (1) | Existing Court (2) | Jurisdiction as Special Court (3) |
| 1 | Court of Additional Special Judge, Anti-Corruption at Jammu and Srinagar | State of Jammu and Kashmir |
| 2 | Presiding Officers of Court No’s. 37 and 58 of the City Civil and Sessions Court, Greater Mumbai | State of Maharastra |
| 3 | Court of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Union territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli at Silvassa | Union Territories of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu |
| 4 | Court of District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge, Panji | State of Goa |
| 5 | Court of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural), situated at Mirzapur, Ahmedabad | State of Gujarat |
| 6 | 9th Additional Session Judge, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh | State of Madhya Pradesh |
| 7 | Court of Additional District and Session Judge, Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | Union territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands |
| 8 | 2nd Special Court, Calcutta | State of West Bengal |
2. The aforesaid Courts mentioned in column number (2) shall exercise the jurisdiction as Special Courts in respect of jurisdiction mentioned in column number (3).
[ F No. 01/12/2009-CL-I (Vol. IV) ]
AMARDEEP SINGH BHATIA
Jt. Secy
The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…
Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…
Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…
Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…
ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…
Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…