Companies Act

Due date and Form No. BEN-1 to be revised shortly MCA Circular

Due date and Form No. BEN-1 to be revised. Due date of 10th September for filing BEN-1 declaration and revised BEN-1 to be notified shortly

General Circular No. 08/2018

F.No.01/01/2018-CL-V
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

5th Floor, ‘A’ Wing Shastri Bhawan,
Dr. R.P. Road. New Delhi

Dated: 10.09.2018

To
All Regional Directors,

All Registrars of Companies,
All Stakeholders.

Sir,
In continuation of General Circular No. 07/2018 dated 06.09.2018, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs has received from stakeholders expressing certain difficulties in filing a declaration in Form No. BEN-1 in respect of Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018 notified uide G.S.R. No. 561(E) dated 13.06.2018.

2. Accordingly, the matter has been examined and it is hereby informed that keeping in view stakeholders concerns, Form No. BEN-1 would be revised. As such, the due date of  10th September, 2018 for filing BEN-1 declaration would
be revised and a revised BEN-l form would be notified shortly. Stakeholders are advised to file declaration as per the revised form only and adhere to the timelines which will be specified therein.

3. This issues with approval of the competent authority.

Yours faithfully

(KMS Narayanan)
Assiatant Director Policy
Ph: 23387263

Copy forwarded for information and necessary action to:-
1. E-Governance Section
2. Guard File.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

1 week ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago