Exemption to Specified IFSC Unlisted Public companies from the provisions of Companies Act, 2016. MCA Notification under section 462
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
Notification
New Delhi, the 4th January, 2017
G.S.R. (E) – In exercise of the powers conferred by clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (1) of section 462 and in pursuance of sub-section (2) of the said section of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government, in the interest of the public, hereby directs that certain provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), as specified in column (2) of the Table, shall not apply or shall apply with such exceptions, modifications and adaptations as specified in column (3) of the said table, to an unlisted public company which is licensed to operate by the Reserve Bank of India or the Securities and Exchange Board of India or the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India from the International Financial Services Centre located in an approved multi services Special Economic Zone set up unde the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 (28 of 2005) read with the Special Economic Zones Rules, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Specified IFSC public company’) namely:-
| Serial Number | Provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) | Exceptions/Modifications/Adaptations |
| (1) | (2) | (3) |
[F. No. 3/1/2015-CL.I]
(Amardeep Singh Bhatia)
Joint Secretary to the Government of India
Click Here to download full Notification Click Here >>
Bank was liable to pay compensation to borrower as it did not verify the progress of construction before loan disbursals…
No timeline mentioned in PMLA to forward the arrest order and the material in possession to the Adjudicating Authority. It…
Whether the release of seized assets is mandatory upon completion of 120 days –High Court refers the case to a…
EPFO Extends date of filing of new ECR for the wage month September to 31st October 2026 Taking into account…
Earlier acceptance of investment is a relevant evidence in evaluating subsequent allegation that investments were fictitious from inception – High…
A bald statement recorded during survey would not in itself be a foundation for any addition - ITAT In a…