Companies Act

MCA further extends time for filing DIR-3-KYC & web-DIR 3-KYC-WEB upto 31.10.2025

MCA further extended time for filing e-form DIR-3-KYC and web-form DIR 3-KYC-WEB without fee upto 31.10.2025

Ministry of Corporate Affairs has issued circular No. 05/2025 to further extend time for filing e-form DIR-3-KYC and web-form DIR 3-KYC-WEB without fee upto to 31.10.2025.

Earlier MCA had issued General Circular No. 04/2025 dated 29.09.2025 stating that MCA had received suggestions to extend the time beyond 30.09.2025 for filing of e-form DIR3-KYC and web-form DIR-3-KYC-WEB without payment of filing fee. As a result, MCA had allowed filing of e-form DIR-3-KYC and web-form DIR-3-KYC-WEB without filing fee upto 15th October, 2025.

Share

Recent Posts

  • CA CS CMA

CA accused of forgery by advising investment in a firm gets bail by Allahabad High Court

Chartered Accountant accused of forgery and misappropriation of fund by advising investment in a particular firm gets bail  In a…

13 hours ago
  • consumer-protection

Software had nexus with generation of profits, purchaser can’t be said a consumer – SC

Purchase of software had a nexus with generation of profits, therefore purchaser was not a consumer under Consumer Protection Act…

16 hours ago
  • post office

Termination upheld of Postmaster who embezzled money by mere stamping passbooks

Termination upheld of Postmaster who embezzled deposit money by mere stamping passbooks of account holders. In a recent judgment, Hon'ble…

17 hours ago
  • GST

Supreme Court stays DGGI order on the issue of two parallel GST proceedings

Supreme Court stays DGGI order on the issue of bar on two parallel GST proceedings in terms of Section 6(2)(b)…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Assessee can’t be said to indulged in penny stock sale without showing his involvement

Assessee could not said to indulged in penny stock sale on human probabilities without showing his involvement – ITAT deleted…

24 hours ago
  • Excise/Custom

Before staying CESTAT order High Court should have framed substantial questions of law – SC

Before staying CESTAT order the High Court should have framed the substantial questions of law and thereafter could have passed…

2 days ago