e-form DIR-3 KYC or DIR-3 KYC-WEB for FY 2018-19 to be filed on or before 14.10.2019

Form DIR-3 KYC or web form DIR-3 KYC-WEB for FY 2018-19 to be filed on or before 14.10.2019 

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 30th September, 2019

GSR……..(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by the second proviso to sub-section (1), sub-section  (4) and clause (f) of sub-section (6) of section 149, sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 150, section 151, sub-section (5) of section 152, section 153, section 154, section 157, section 160, sub-section (1) of section 168 and section 170 read with section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014, namely:-

1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Fourth Amendment Rules, 2019.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014, in rule 12A, after the fourth proviso, the following Note shall be inserted , namely:-

“Note: For the financial year  ending on 31st March, 2019, the individual shall submit e-form DIR-3 KYC or web form DIR-3 KYC-WEB, as the case may be, on or before the 14th October, 2019.”.

[F. No. 1/22/2013-CL- V]

(K.V.R. Murty)

Joint Secretary to the Government of India Note: The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II,Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 259(E) ,dated the 31st March, 2014 and subsequently amended Vide the following notifications:-

*********

Download Notification Click Here >>

• Taxes on sales comprising in turnover to be excluded for estimating net profit
• Capital contribution deposited in assessee’s bank not partnership firm – Addition 69A upheld
• Bail granted to a CA accused in a GST evasion of more than 40 crores
• Every provision invoked casts a different onus, quoting wrong section prejudice the assessee
• Liability under MV Act can’t be decided on the grounds of sympathy alone – Supreme Court