Companies Act

Gap between two consecutive Board meetings may extend to 180 days during Quarter – April to June 2021 & July to Sep 2021

Gap between two consecutive Board meetings may extend to 180 days during Quarter – April to June 2021 & Quarter – July to September, 2021 – MCA

General Circular No. 08/2021

F No 2/6/2020-CL-V
Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs

5th Floor. ‘A’ Wing. Shastri Bhawan
Dr. R. P. Road New Delhi

Dated 03-05-2021

To
The DGCoA
All Regional Directors.
All Registrar of Companies
All Stakeholders

Subject: Gap between two board meetings under section 173 of the Companies Act. 2013 (CA-13) – Clarification – reg.

Sir/Madam

In view of the difficulties arising due to resurgence of Covid-19 and requests received from stakeholders. It has been decided that the requirement of holding meetings of the Board of the companies within the intervals provided in section 173 of the Companies Act. 2013 (120 days) stands extended by a period of 60 days for fast two quarters of Financial Year 2021.22. Accordingly, the gap between two consecutive meetings of the Board may extend to 180 days during the Quarter – April to June 2021 and Quarter – July to September, 2021, Instead of 120 days as required in the Companies Act 2013

2. This issues with the approval of the competent authority

Yours faithfully,

(KMS Narayanan)
Assistant Director (policy)

Download Circular Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

3 hours ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

5 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

1 week ago