Companies Act

MCA appoints RoCs as adjudicating officers for penalties under LLP Act 2008.

MCA has appointed the following Registrar of Companies as adjudicating officers for penalties under LLP Act 2008.

1. Registrar of Companies, Delhi
2. Registrar of Companies, Chandigarh
3. Registrar of Companies, Kanpur
5. Registrar of Companies-cum-Official Liquidator, Jammu
6. Registrar of Companies-cum-Official Liquidator, Shimla
7. Registrar of Companies, Kolkata
8. Registrar of Companies-cum-Official Liquidator, Patna
9. Registrar of Companies-cum-Official Liquidator, Cuttack
10. Registrar of Companies-cum-Official Liquidator, Ranchi
11. Registrar of Companies, Guwahati
12. Registrar of Companies, Chennai
13. Registrar of Companies, Coimbatore
14. Registrar of Companies, Puducherry
15. Registrar of Companies, Ernakulam 
16. Registrar of Companies, Hyderabad
17. Registrar of Companies, Bangalore
18. Registrar of Companies
19. Registrar of Companies, Pune
20. Registrar of Companies-cum-Official Liquidator, Goa
21. Registrar of Companies, Ahmedabad
22. Registrar of Companies, Gwalior
23. Registrar of Companies-cum-Official Liquidator, Bilaspur
24. Registrar of Companies-cum-Official Liquidator, Jaipur
25. Registrar of Companies, Vijayawada

Download Complete Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

15 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

3 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

4 days ago