Companies Act

Revised fee for filing Form No. DIR-3 KYC Web w.e.f. 22/04/2026

MCA notifies revised fee for filing Form No. DIR-3 KYC Web w.e.f. 22/04/2026

The MCA has notified the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026 to amend the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014.

The revised fee for filing Form No. DIR-3 KYC Web under Rule 12A of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014 is as under:

Fee for Form No. DIR-3 KYC Web Amount (Rs.)
(i) The form is filed within the timeline provided in sub-rule (1) of rule 12A of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014 NIL
(ii) The form is filed after the timeline referred to in serial number (i), or filed for reactivation of DIN 5000
(iii) Form DIR-3-KYC Web filed again at any time for any change as provided in subrule (2) of rule 12A of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014 500 (for every filing)

Note : The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Extraordinary, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 268(E), dated the 31st March, 2014 and last amended, vide number G.S.R. 360(E) dated the 30th May, 2025

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

7 days ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago