Companies Act

MCA revises fees for filing charge documents with ROC-Read Notification

MCA revises fees for filing charge documents with ROC

Government of India
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

Notification

New Delhi, dated 30th April, 2019

G.S.R. 340(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sections 396,398,399, 403 and 404 read with sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014, namely:—

1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Third Amendment Rules, 2019.

(2) Save as otherwise provided, they shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014, in the Annexure, in item “I (Fee for filing under section 403 of the Companies Act, 2013)”,-

(i) in sub-item 13, in the Table of additional fee, in third column, for the column heading, the column heading “Forms excluding charge documents”, shall be substituted;

(ii) after sub-item ‘D’, the following sub- item shall be inserted, namely:–

“E. Fees for filing charge documents.

(a) charges created or modified before the 2nd November, 2018, and allowed to be filed within a period of three hundred days of such creation or six months from the 2ndNovember, 2018, as the case may be, the following additional fees shall be payable:-

Sl.No. Period of delay Additional Fee applicable
1. Up to 30 days 2 times of normal fees
2. More than 30 days and up to 60 days 4 times of normal fees
3. More than 60 days and up to 90 days 6 times of normal fees
4. More than 90 days and up to 180 days 10 times of normal fees
5. More than 180 days 12 times of normal fees

(b) For the charges created or modified on or after the 2nd November, 2018:-

(A) The following additional fees or advalorem fees, as the case may be, shall be payable upto 31st July, 2019, by all companies:-

S1 . No. Period of delay Additional/Advalorem Fees applicable
1. Up to 30 days 2 times of normal fees
2. More than 30 days and up to 60 days 4 times of normal fees
3. More than 60 days and up to 90 days 6 times of normal fees

(B) the following additional fees or advalorem fees as the case may be, shall be payable with effect from 1st August, 2019:-

SI. No. Period of delay Small Companies and One Person Company Other than Small Companies and One Person Company
1. Up to 30 days 3 times of normal
fees
6 times of normal fees
2. More than 30 days and up to 90 days 3 times of normal fees plus an ad valorem fee of 0.025 per cent. of the amount secured by the charge, subject to the maximum of one lakh rupees. 6 times of normal fees, plus an ad valorem fee of 0.05 per cent. of the amount secured by the charge, subject to the maximum of five lakh rupees”.

[F. No. 01/16 2013 CL-V (Pt-I)]

K.V.R. MURTY, Joint Secretary.

Note: The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Part 11, Extra ordinary, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 268(E), dated the 31st March, 2014 and subsequently amended by:-

Serial Number Notification Number Notification Date
1. G.S.R. 297(E) 28-04-2014
2. G.S.R. 122(E) 24-02-2015
3. G.S.R. 438 (E) 29-05-2015
4. G.S.R. 493(E) 06-05-2016
5. G.S.R. 48(E) 20-01-2018
6. G.S.R. 435(E) 07-05-2018
7. G.S.R.616 (E) 05-07-2018
8. G.S.R.797 (E) 21-08-2018
9. G.S.R.905(E) 20-09-2018
10. G.S.R.143 (E) 21-02-2019
11. G.S.R.329(E) 24-04-2019
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Not making available material forming basis of reopening shows AO had prejudged the issue

AO stating that material forming basis of reopening shall be disclosed at the stage of assessment/re-assessment, indicates that the AO…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Reopening conclusion that assessee was “Non-Filer” was non-application of mind – High Court

Reopening conclusion that assessee was “Non-Filer” despite assessee clearly stating in reply that he had filed ITR was non-application of…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

HC declined to allow voluminous documents physically in Faceless Assessment

High Court declined to allow production of physical documents by in Faceless Assessment simply because they were voluminous In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

2 days ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

3 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

3 days ago