MCA revises tenure of two judicial members in NCLAT till their attaining 67 years of age.
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 5th January, 2021
S.O. 96(E).—In continuation of this Ministry’s notifications S.O. 3855(E) dated 28th October, 2020, the Central Government hereby revise the tenure of Justice (Retd.) Shri Bansi Lal Bhat and Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema as Judicial Member, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) for a period till their attaining the age of 67 years, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F.No. A-40012/1/2020-Ad.IV]
GYANESHWAR KUMAR SINGH,Jt. Secy.
Note: The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3,Sub-section (ii), vide numbers S.O. 3863(E) and S.O. 3864(E), dated the 11th December, 2017.
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 15th January, 2021
S.O.192(E).––In continuation of this Ministry’s notifications S.O. 1049(E) dated 12th March, 2020, S.O. 2226(E) dated 06th July, 2020, S.O. 3168(E) dated 17th September, 2020 and S.O. 3856(E) dated 28th October, 2020, the term of office of Justice (Retd.) Shri Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) as officiating Chairperson, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) is extended for a period of three months w.e.f. 01.01.2021 or till the appointment of regular Chairperson in NCLAT or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.
[F.No.A-40012/1/2020-Ad.IV]
GYANESHWAR KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Secy.
Note: The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide number S.O. 1049(E), dated the 12th March, 2020.
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…