No Extension of deadline of Companies Fresh Start Scheme (CFSS) and LLP Settlement Scheme. No such proposal under consideration says Minister
MCA through the General Circular no. 12/2020 dated 30.3.2020, launched the “Companies Fresh Start Scheme, 2020 which provided opportunity to companies to make good any filing related defaults, regardless of duration of defaults, and make a fresh start as a fully compliant company.
As per press release issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), The Union Minister of State for Finance & Corporate Affairs, in a written reply to a question in Rajya Sabha stated that the Scheme condoned the delay in filing belated documents and gave immunity from prosecution and proceedings for imposition of penalty which might arise on account of such delayed filing of documents. No additional fees was charged for late filing during a moratorium period from 1st April to 31st December, 2020 in respect of documents, returns etc. required to be filed in MCA-21 Registry.
As per records, 4,73,131 Indian Companies and 1,065 number of Foreign Companies have benefited by availing the CFSS, 2020 scheme for filing their pending documents.
Similarly, for Limited Liability Partnerships (‘LLPs’), the MCA through General Circular No.6/2020 dated 04.03.2020 introduced LLP Settlement Scheme, 2020 to provide one-time relaxation in additional fees to the defaulting Limited Liability Partnerships to make good their defaults by filing pending documents with the Registrar of Companies (‘ROC’ or ‘Registrar’).
The LLP settlement scheme was initially rolled out from 16.03.2020 to 13.06.2020 for certain filings by LLPs. Further, due to the COVID-19 pandemic the said scheme was modified to cover all e-forms and extended from 01.04.2020 to 31.12.2020. As per records, 1,05,643 LLPs have benefited by availing the LLP settlement scheme 2020 for filing their pending documents.
Both the schemes have ended on 31.12.2020. A sufficient period of time of 09 months was accorded in the schemes to companies and LLPs to make good their defaults.
According to the Minister, further extension of the scheme was not found necessary and therefore, no such proposal is under consideration of the Ministry in this regard.
Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…
Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…
Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…
Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…
Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of current FMV to be further…
ITAT directed AO to serve notice of hearing both through electronic and physical mode upon the assessee In a recent…