Companies Act

Office of ROC cum Official Liquidator at Dehradun established with jurisdiction in whole State of Uttarakhand

Office of ROC cum Official Liquidator at Dehradun established with jurisdiction in whole State of Uttarakhand

[To be published in the Official Gazette, Extra Ordinary Part-II, Section-3, sub­ section (ii)]

Ministry of Corporate Affairs

Notifications

New Delhi, Dated: 26.10.2018

S.O.         (E) In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 396 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) (herein after referred to as the said Act), the Central Government hereby establishes the office of the Registrar of Companies cum Official Liquidator at Dehradun, having territorial jurisdiction in the whole State of Uttarakhand for discharging the functions of the Registrar of Companies under the various provisions of the said Act and appoints the Registrar of Companies cum Official Liquidator at Dehradun for the purpose of registration of companies and discharging the functions under the said Act in the State of  Uttarakhand.

2. This notification shall come into force with effect from 29.10.2018.

[F. No.1/16/ 2013 -CL-V]

(Gyaneshwar Kumar Singh)
Joint Secretary to the Government of India

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

9 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

18 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

2 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

3 days ago