Companies Act

Period of 45 days for reporting MSME overdues from date of acceptance of goods/services-MCA

Period of 45 days for reporting MSME over dues to be calculated from the date of of acceptance or deemed acceptance of goods or services – MCA

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 15th July, 2024

S.O. 2751(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 405 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following Order to amend the Specified Companies (Furnishing of information about payment to micro and small enterprise suppliers) Order, 2019 namely:

1. (1) This Order may be called the Specified Companies (Furnishing of information about payment to micro and small enterprise suppliers) Amendment Order, 2024.

(2) It shall come into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Specified Companies (Furnishing of information about payment to micro and small enterprise suppliers) Order, 2019 (herein after referred to as the said order),-

(i) in paragraph 3, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-

“Provided that only those specified companies which are having payments pending to any micro or small enterprises for more than 45 days from the date of acceptance or the date of deemed acceptance of the goods or services under section 9 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (27 of 2006) shall furnish the information in MSME Form-1.”

(ii) in Annexure, for MSME Form-1, the following form shall be substituted, namely: –

MSME Form I
Form for furnishing half yearly return with the registrar in respect of
outstanding payments to Micro or Small Enterprises
[Pursuant to Order 2 and 3 dated 22 January, 2019 issued under
Section 405 of the Companies Act, 2013

Note:- The Principal order was published in the Gazzette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-Section (ii), vide notification number S.O. 368(E), dated the 22nd January, 2019. 

Download MCA Notification on MSME Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

7 days ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago