Companies Act

Period of 45 days for reporting MSME overdues from date of acceptance of goods/services-MCA

Period of 45 days for reporting MSME over dues to be calculated from the date of of acceptance or deemed acceptance of goods or services – MCA

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 15th July, 2024

S.O. 2751(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 405 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following Order to amend the Specified Companies (Furnishing of information about payment to micro and small enterprise suppliers) Order, 2019 namely:

1. (1) This Order may be called the Specified Companies (Furnishing of information about payment to micro and small enterprise suppliers) Amendment Order, 2024.

(2) It shall come into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Specified Companies (Furnishing of information about payment to micro and small enterprise suppliers) Order, 2019 (herein after referred to as the said order),-

(i) in paragraph 3, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-

“Provided that only those specified companies which are having payments pending to any micro or small enterprises for more than 45 days from the date of acceptance or the date of deemed acceptance of the goods or services under section 9 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (27 of 2006) shall furnish the information in MSME Form-1.”

(ii) in Annexure, for MSME Form-1, the following form shall be substituted, namely: –

MSME Form I
Form for furnishing half yearly return with the registrar in respect of
outstanding payments to Micro or Small Enterprises
[Pursuant to Order 2 and 3 dated 22 January, 2019 issued under
Section 405 of the Companies Act, 2013

Note:- The Principal order was published in the Gazzette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-Section (ii), vide notification number S.O. 368(E), dated the 22nd January, 2019. 

Download MCA Notification on MSME Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago