Companies Act

Rejected company name rectification application can not be revived u/s 16(1)(a) of the Companies Act 2013 viz-a-viz 1956 Act.

Rejected company name rectification application can not be revived u/s 16(1)(a) of the Companies Act 2013 with reference 1956 Act.

Section 16 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for rectification in the name of the company. 16. As per sub-section (1) the Central Government in case a company through inadvertence or otherwise, on its first registration or on its registration by a new name, is registered by a name which is identical with or too nearly resembles the name of a company already in existence, may direct the company to change its name within a period of three months from the issue of such direction.

MCA by circular has clarified the representations from Regional Directors on the issue as under:

General Circular No. 04/2017

F. N’o. 17/89/2016-CL-V GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY  OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

5th Floor, ‘A’ Wing Shastri Bhawan,
Dr. R.P. Road, New Delhi
Dated :16.05.2017

To
All Regional Directors,
All Registrars o( Companies,
All Stakeholders

 

Subject: Clarification regarding  applicability of  Section 16 (1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 with reference to cases under corresponding provisions of Companies Act, 1956 -reg.

Sir,

A representation was received from Regional Director, Mumbai seeking clarification as to whether Regional Directors can entertain fresh applications u/s 16 of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of applications which were earlier rejected by them under Companies Act, 1956 on the ground of being time barred as the prescribed period of twelve months had been completed (under Section 22(1)(ii)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956).  It was expressed that Section 16 of the Companies Act, 2013 does not specify any time limitation.

2 The matter has been examined in consultation with D/o Legal Affairs and it is clarified that applications that were rejected by Regional Directors under Section 22(1)(ii)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956, on the ground that such applications were made  after the requisite period of twelve months specified therein, can not apply afresh under section 16(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, as the extinguished  limitation can not be considered to be revived even if no limitation period has been specified/laid down in the said section.

3. This issues with approval of the Secretary, MCA.

Yours’ Faithfully

(KMS Narayanan)
Assistant Director
Tel: +91-11-23387263

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

CBDT extends due date of tax audit for FY 2025-26 to 21st October 2026

CBDT has extended the due date for furnishing Return of Income for Assessment Year 2026-27 (FY 2025-26) in respect of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Denying accumulation of u/s 11(2) merely on grounds of delay in filing Form No. 10 is unsustainable

Denying the accumulation of u/s 11(2) merely on grounds of a procedural delay in filing Form No. 10 is unsustainable…

1 week ago
  • Empanelment

Engagement of 05 Young Professionals CAs at Central Registrar of Cooperative Society

Engagement of 05 Young Professionals CAs in the Office of Central Registrar of Cooperative Society on contractual basis The office…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

AO can’t take two different stands on immunity u/s 270AA(2) for a same transaction

Immunity u/s 270AA(2) in respect of a single transaction can not be denied to one assessee when the penalty was…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT held 2000 gram jewellery reasonable in view of customary practices & CBDT Instruction

ITAT deleted addition u/s 69A towards jewellery found in search in view of Indian traditions, CBDT Instruction and High Court…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Documents obtained post search & information obtained from public domain not incriminating material

Documents obtained post search and information obtained from the public domain not incriminating material. Documents obtained by AO post search…

1 week ago