Companies Act

Rejected company name rectification application can not be revived u/s 16(1)(a) of the Companies Act 2013 viz-a-viz 1956 Act.

Rejected company name rectification application can not be revived u/s 16(1)(a) of the Companies Act 2013 with reference 1956 Act.

Section 16 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for rectification in the name of the company. 16. As per sub-section (1) the Central Government in case a company through inadvertence or otherwise, on its first registration or on its registration by a new name, is registered by a name which is identical with or too nearly resembles the name of a company already in existence, may direct the company to change its name within a period of three months from the issue of such direction.

MCA by circular has clarified the representations from Regional Directors on the issue as under:

General Circular No. 04/2017

F. N’o. 17/89/2016-CL-V GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY  OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

5th Floor, ‘A’ Wing Shastri Bhawan,
Dr. R.P. Road, New Delhi
Dated :16.05.2017

To
All Regional Directors,
All Registrars o( Companies,
All Stakeholders

 

Subject: Clarification regarding  applicability of  Section 16 (1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 with reference to cases under corresponding provisions of Companies Act, 1956 -reg.

Sir,

A representation was received from Regional Director, Mumbai seeking clarification as to whether Regional Directors can entertain fresh applications u/s 16 of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of applications which were earlier rejected by them under Companies Act, 1956 on the ground of being time barred as the prescribed period of twelve months had been completed (under Section 22(1)(ii)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956).  It was expressed that Section 16 of the Companies Act, 2013 does not specify any time limitation.

2 The matter has been examined in consultation with D/o Legal Affairs and it is clarified that applications that were rejected by Regional Directors under Section 22(1)(ii)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956, on the ground that such applications were made  after the requisite period of twelve months specified therein, can not apply afresh under section 16(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, as the extinguished  limitation can not be considered to be revived even if no limitation period has been specified/laid down in the said section.

3. This issues with approval of the Secretary, MCA.

Yours’ Faithfully

(KMS Narayanan)
Assistant Director
Tel: +91-11-23387263

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Disallowance of a deduction does not automatically lead to misreporting of income

A claim of deduction made in return, even if found inadmissible, does not automatically lead to misreporting of income -…

22 hours ago
  • Income Tax

After holding cash receipts/payments as unexplained, ad-hoc addition can not be made – HC

After holding that the cash receipts and cash payments are unexplained, ad-hoc estimation of income can not be adopted –…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Dividing total turnover by 365 days to arrive at daily cash sale is based on conjectures and surmises

Dividing total turnover by 365 days and concluding that assessee could not have made such cash sale on a single…

5 days ago
  • Empanelment

NERIST Arunachal Pradesh invites EoI for Empanelment of Chartered Accountant firm

NERIST Arunachal Pradesh invites EoI for Empanelment of Chartered Accountant firm North Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology, (NERIST)…

7 days ago
  • Empanelment

Sibsagar University invites EoI for Appointment of Internal Auditor for 01.08.2024 to 31.03.2026.

Sibsagar University invites Expression of Interest (EOI) for Appointment of Internal Auditor  Sibsagar University invites Expression of Interest (EOI) from reputed…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

Andhra Pradesh High Court struck down Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as unconstitutional

In a recent judgment Andhra Pradesh High Court struck down Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as unconstitutional.…

7 days ago