Companies Act

Rejected company name rectification application can not be revived u/s 16(1)(a) of the Companies Act 2013 viz-a-viz 1956 Act.

Rejected company name rectification application can not be revived u/s 16(1)(a) of the Companies Act 2013 with reference 1956 Act.

Section 16 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for rectification in the name of the company. 16. As per sub-section (1) the Central Government in case a company through inadvertence or otherwise, on its first registration or on its registration by a new name, is registered by a name which is identical with or too nearly resembles the name of a company already in existence, may direct the company to change its name within a period of three months from the issue of such direction.

MCA by circular has clarified the representations from Regional Directors on the issue as under:

General Circular No. 04/2017

F. N’o. 17/89/2016-CL-V GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY  OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

5th Floor, ‘A’ Wing Shastri Bhawan,
Dr. R.P. Road, New Delhi
Dated :16.05.2017

To
All Regional Directors,
All Registrars o( Companies,
All Stakeholders

 

Subject: Clarification regarding  applicability of  Section 16 (1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 with reference to cases under corresponding provisions of Companies Act, 1956 -reg.

Sir,

A representation was received from Regional Director, Mumbai seeking clarification as to whether Regional Directors can entertain fresh applications u/s 16 of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of applications which were earlier rejected by them under Companies Act, 1956 on the ground of being time barred as the prescribed period of twelve months had been completed (under Section 22(1)(ii)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956).  It was expressed that Section 16 of the Companies Act, 2013 does not specify any time limitation.

2 The matter has been examined in consultation with D/o Legal Affairs and it is clarified that applications that were rejected by Regional Directors under Section 22(1)(ii)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956, on the ground that such applications were made  after the requisite period of twelve months specified therein, can not apply afresh under section 16(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, as the extinguished  limitation can not be considered to be revived even if no limitation period has been specified/laid down in the said section.

3. This issues with approval of the Secretary, MCA.

Yours’ Faithfully

(KMS Narayanan)
Assistant Director
Tel: +91-11-23387263

Share

Recent Posts

  • huf

When testator was illiterate, burden was on propounder of Will to satisfy judicial conscience of Court

If judicial conscience of a final court of fact is not satisfied about the valid execution of the Will, it…

9 hours ago
  • Insurance

Which ITRS are relevant for assessing income of deceased person under MV Act 1988

SC laid downs guidelines for use of ITRS for assessing annual income of deceased person under Motor Vehicles Act 1988…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT condones delay in filing Form No. 10AB

CBDT condones delay in filing Form No. 10AB furnished electronically between 01.10.2025 to 31.03.2026. CBDT has condoned the delay in…

4 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC express concern over AI generated judgments/paragraphs escaping scrutiny by NCLT/NCLAT

Supreme Court expresses serious concerns over AI generated judgments/paragraphs relied upon by the NCLT/NCLAT In a recent judgment, the Hon'ble…

4 days ago
  • ICAI

ICAI to take disciplinary action for quoting very low & incommensurate fee by Chartered Accountants

ICAI to take disciplinary action for quoting very low and incommensurate fee by Chartered Accountants As per the announcement made…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU Version 6.00 and FVU 9.5 RPU V 1.0 from Tax Year 2026-27 – Download

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU Version 6.0 from FY 2007-08 NSDL has revised the e-TDS TCS RPU utility for preparing…

5 days ago