Companies Act

Rejected company name rectification application can not be revived u/s 16(1)(a) of the Companies Act 2013 viz-a-viz 1956 Act.

Rejected company name rectification application can not be revived u/s 16(1)(a) of the Companies Act 2013 with reference 1956 Act.

Section 16 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for rectification in the name of the company. 16. As per sub-section (1) the Central Government in case a company through inadvertence or otherwise, on its first registration or on its registration by a new name, is registered by a name which is identical with or too nearly resembles the name of a company already in existence, may direct the company to change its name within a period of three months from the issue of such direction.

MCA by circular has clarified the representations from Regional Directors on the issue as under:

General Circular No. 04/2017

F. N’o. 17/89/2016-CL-V GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY  OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

5th Floor, ‘A’ Wing Shastri Bhawan,
Dr. R.P. Road, New Delhi
Dated :16.05.2017

To
All Regional Directors,
All Registrars o( Companies,
All Stakeholders

 

Subject: Clarification regarding  applicability of  Section 16 (1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 with reference to cases under corresponding provisions of Companies Act, 1956 -reg.

Sir,

A representation was received from Regional Director, Mumbai seeking clarification as to whether Regional Directors can entertain fresh applications u/s 16 of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of applications which were earlier rejected by them under Companies Act, 1956 on the ground of being time barred as the prescribed period of twelve months had been completed (under Section 22(1)(ii)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956).  It was expressed that Section 16 of the Companies Act, 2013 does not specify any time limitation.

2 The matter has been examined in consultation with D/o Legal Affairs and it is clarified that applications that were rejected by Regional Directors under Section 22(1)(ii)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956, on the ground that such applications were made  after the requisite period of twelve months specified therein, can not apply afresh under section 16(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, as the extinguished  limitation can not be considered to be revived even if no limitation period has been specified/laid down in the said section.

3. This issues with approval of the Secretary, MCA.

Yours’ Faithfully

(KMS Narayanan)
Assistant Director
Tel: +91-11-23387263

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU Version 1.2 for Tax Year 2026-27 – Download

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU version 1.2 for Tax Year 2026-27 NSDL has revised the e-TDS TCS RPU utility for…

4 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

Deprecation allowable u/s 11(6) if capital expenditure not claimed as application of income

Assessee entitled to claim deprecation u/s 11(6) if corresponding capital expenditure was not claimed as application of income - ITAT…

17 hours ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT cautions CAs issuing certificates in Form 15CB/Form146 to exercise due care & diligence

Chartered Accountants issuing certificates in Form 15CB/Form146 are expected to exercise due care, diligence and professional judgment – CBDT CBDT…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Section 292C carry no presumption of correctness of seized documents contents against third party

Section 292C of the Income Tax Act 1961 indeed carries presumption of correctness of such seized documents contents but only…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Condonation of delay u/s 119(2)(b) for filing revised return to avail benefits u/s 44ADA

PCIT directed to consider condonation of delay u/s 119(2)(b) in filing revised return to availing benefits of section 44ADA In…

3 days ago
  • arbitration

Whether condition of pre-deposit prior to reference to Arbitration is arbitrary & violative of right to sue?

Whether condition of pre-deposit prior to reference to Arbitration is arbitrary and violative of the right to sue – Division…

3 days ago