Companies Act

Special Courts under Companies Act at Mizoram, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh for speedy trial

Special Courts under Companies Act at Mizoram, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh for speedy trial of offences punishable with imprisonment of 2 years or more

[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (ii)]

GOVERNMENT  OF INDIA
MINISTRY  OF CORPORATE  AFFAIRS

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 5th September, 2018

S.O. ……….(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 435 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court at Guwahati, hereby designates the following Courts mentioned in column (2) of the Table below as Special Courts for the purposes of providing speedy trial of offences punishable with imprisonment of two years or more under the said Act, namely:-

Table

S. No. Courts Jurisdiction as Special Courts
(1) (2) (3)
1 Court of District and Sessions Judge at Kohima State of Nagaland
2 Court of District and Sessions Judge at Aizawl State of Mizoram
3 West Session Division, Yupia State of Arunachal Pradesh

[F.No. 01/12/2009-CL-I (Vol.IV)]

K.V. R. MURTY)
JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

13 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

22 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

3 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

4 days ago