Companies Act

Special Courts under Companies Act at Mizoram, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh for speedy trial

Special Courts under Companies Act at Mizoram, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh for speedy trial of offences punishable with imprisonment of 2 years or more

[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (ii)]

GOVERNMENT  OF INDIA
MINISTRY  OF CORPORATE  AFFAIRS

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 5th September, 2018

S.O. ……….(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 435 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court at Guwahati, hereby designates the following Courts mentioned in column (2) of the Table below as Special Courts for the purposes of providing speedy trial of offences punishable with imprisonment of two years or more under the said Act, namely:-

Table

S. No. Courts Jurisdiction as Special Courts
(1) (2) (3)
1 Court of District and Sessions Judge at Kohima State of Nagaland
2 Court of District and Sessions Judge at Aizawl State of Mizoram
3 West Session Division, Yupia State of Arunachal Pradesh

[F.No. 01/12/2009-CL-I (Vol.IV)]

K.V. R. MURTY)
JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago