DGFT

Eligibility of Exports from SEZ/EOU units on behalf of DTA units under MEIS-Clarification

Eligibility of Exports from SEZ/EOU units on behalf of DTA units under Merchandise Exports from India Scheme. Either EOU/SEZ or DTA unit can claim benefits

Government of India
Department of Commerce
Directorate General of Foreign Trade
Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi
Policy 3 Division

Policy Circular No.  20/2015-2020

Dated:  22nd February , 2019

To,
1. All Regional Authorities of the DGFT
2. All Exporters /Members of Trade

Subject:  Clarification on eligibility of Exports made from SEZ/EOU units on  behalf of the DTA units, but not through DTA units

This Directorate has received references from exporters seeking clarification on eligibility of Exports made from SEZ/EOU units on behalf of DTA units under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) in the context of the Para 3.06 – ineligible categories of MEIS , sub para (v) , which states that SEZ/ EOU /EHTP/ BTP /FTWZ products exported through DTA units are ineligible for MEIS rewards.

2. The matter has been examined in this It is clarified that the exports which are made/have been made directly from a EOU/ SEZ unit to Foreign consumer in which export documents are prepared and filed at the customs office of concerned SEZ/EOU Unit, mentionin g the name of the EOU/SEZ unit along with the name of the DTA unit on whose behalf the exports is made, would be eligible for MEIS benefits subject to condition that only one of the said unit s i.e. either EOU/SEZ unit or the DTA unit can claim the benefits under MEIS. It is further clarified that the eligibility as above, is applicable to only those cases where goods are produced by the EOU/SEZ unit and are exported directly to the foreign consumer , with the name of the DTA.

3. It is further clarified that the MEIS benefits may be taken by the SEZ/ EOU or DTA and not both, on the basis of disclaimer from the other firm, subject to fulfillment of each of the criterion as below for every shippin g bill for which claim is made under MIES.

(i) The Commercial Invoice shows the name of the DTA exporter  and shows the name of the SEZ/EOU unit as the manufacturer.

(ii) The declaration of intent to avail MEIS benefits has been specified  in the Commercial Invoice.

(iii) The related GST Invoice/ARE-1 has been filed by the DTA firm and shows the name of the SEZ/ EOU unit as manufacturer and it has been signed by both the DTA and SEZ/EOU unit as the case may be.

(iv) The relevant Shipping bill shows the name of the exporter and shows the details as Factory sealed with the address and name of the EOU/SEZ

(v) The scheme details in the related shipping bill are shown as EOU/EPZ/SEZ/EHTP/STP (with Scheme Code as 21-EOU/EPZ/SEZ/EHTP /STP).

(vi) Third party details in the related Shipping bill should show DTA.

(vii) The e-BRC is in the name of the DTA firm.

4. This issues with the approval of Competent Authority.

(N. K. SRIVASTAVA)
Additional Director General of Foreign Trade

(Issued from F. No. 01/61/180/258 /AM17/PC-3)

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

15 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago