EPFO

Compliance of Labour Laws for contract labour employed in Railway especially for payment of minimum wages by Contractors

Compliance of Labour Laws for contract labour employed in Railway especially for payment of minimum wages by Contractors Labour hired in various Railway departments 

Indian Railways executes a wide range of works for creation, repair and ·maintenance of its various assets including stations, coaches, wagons, coaching depots, locomotives,  tracks  etc. Sometimes, contracts are also entered for rendering services too. Some of these works/services are executed by way of outsourcing to external agencies (Contractors) who work for the Railways and engage labours for carrying out the work.

According to a recent communication of Railway Board, Ministry of Railways, it has been noticed that contractors are indulging in many irregularities especially in payment of wages to Contract Labour employed in various Railway departments are not being paid Minimum Wages as per the latest Minimum Wages orders. 

As per the allegations, some unscrupulous Contractors are resorting to following strategies to deceitfully deprive Contract Labour of their rightful wages:

(i) Payment of less wages through cash; and

(ii) forcibly grabbing, beforehand , of ATM/Debit Cards of Contract Labour so that Contractors can withdraw, unauthorisedly part of the wages (paid in the bank directly) received by Contract Labour.

The Board has reiterated that non-payment of minimum wages to the workers is a criminal offence since it violates the statutory provisions and such unscrupulous Contractors are liable to be taken up under relevant punitive/penal proceedings.  Since Contract Labour are engaged by various departments of Zonal Railways, PUs , it is incumbent on the Principal Heads of the departments to put in place a robust mechanism so that no violation of labour laws takes place in their respective departments. 

The Board has directed that whenever any complaint is received in this regard, stringent deterrent penal actions should be taken by following due procedure by blacklisting the guilty contractors and their Contract should be terminated following the due procedure, apart from initiating criminal proceedings against them with the help of Labour department officials.

Since,  non-compliance   of  terms  and  conditions   of  GCC  entails  violation   of  contractual obligations, any reluctance  on  the  part  of a  contractor  toward  minimum  wages  to contract labour, for the period during which he had admittedly worked, is violative of contract conditions, illegal, unfair and violates the Fundamental right of the Right to Life.

The Board has directed the Railways to  ensure  the  compliance  of  the  labour  laws  (particularly  registration as Principal Employer ensuring  that  Contractors  have  requisite  license  and  ensuring  other  beneficial provisions) and related orders as well as to see that payment of minimum wages to the contract labour engaged directly (Such as Para-medical staff etc.) or through Contractors is ensured, both in letter and spirit.

EPFO, taking note of the above has issued a letter to all zones/regions to to cover all eligible contract workers and ensure compliance by the all offices of Indian Railways.

Download the Communication Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Later SC ruling cannot render an act done in compliance of a court order a statutory default

A subsequent Apex Court ruling on the substantive issue cannot retrospectively make an act done in compliance of a binding…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable to TDS u/s 194A

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable for deduction of tax at source u/s 194A - ITAT Interest…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Typographical error in turnover accepted during assessment not a mistake apparent from record

Typographical error in turnover declared in ITR was not as a mistake apparent from the record u/s 154 when AO…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Plea that assessee was not aware of order cannot be brushed aside in absence of proof of service

Ground taken by assessee that he was not aware of the order cannot be brushed aside so lightly in absence…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Order rejecting stay of income tax demand should recite merits if it is a case for stay or not

In an order rejecting stay of income tax demand there should be a recital of the merits whether it is…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT extends due date of tax audit for FY 2025-26 to 21st October 2026

CBDT has extended the due date for furnishing Return of Income for Assessment Year 2026-27 (FY 2025-26) in respect of…

1 week ago