EPFO

New PF withdrawal rules notification 10th February, 2016 postponed-EPFO Circular

Following the garment workers violent protest in Bengaluru, Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya , at a press conference held yesterday, informed media about the Government decision of postponing the new rules of provident fund withdrawal till 31/07/2016

The EPFO and Ministry communications in this regard are as under:

EMPLOYEES’ PROVIDENT  FUND  ORGANISATION

No: Coord/3(1)2015/ Amendment Scheme                                                                      Date: 19-Apr-16

To
All ACCs (Zones)
All RPFC/OICs of ROs/SROs

Subject: Gazette Notification No.GSR. 158(E) dated 10th February, 2016 for amendment in paragraph 68-NN, 68-0 and 69 and introduction of new paragraph 68-NNNN in EPF Scheme, 1952 -Reg

Sir/Madam,

Please   find   enclosed   herewith the   letter No.S-35012/5/2015-SS.ll  dated 19.04.2016 on the subject cited above.

2. The competent authority has decided to withdraw the said notification dated 10.02.2016.

Yours faithfully

(M.Narayanappa)
Additional Centra l Provident Fund Commissioner

No.S-35012/5/2015-SS.II
Government of India
Ministry of labour & Employment

Shram Shakti Bhawan,Rafi Marg,
New Delhi,Dated the 19th April, 2016

To

The Central Provident Fund Commissioner,
Employees’ Provident Fund Organization,
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,
14, Bhikaji Cama Place,
R K. Puram,New Delhi

Sub.:- Gazette Notification No.G.S.R.158(E) dated 101h February,2016 for amendment in Paragraph 68NN; 680 and 69 and insertion of new Para 68-NNNN in the EPF Scheme, 1952 – regarding.

Sir,

I am directed to refer to this Ministry’s letter of even number dated 31st March, 2016 on the subject cited above and to convey the decision of the competent authority to withdraw the notification dated 10.02.2016.

2    Necessary instruction in this regard may be issued to all concerned.

 

Yours faifthfully,

(Manish Gupta)
Joint Secretary

Download EPFO and Ministry Communications

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

4 days ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

6 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

7 days ago