PF TDS deduction in provident fund claims settlement (Form-19), to be approved by concerned approver (AO/APFC) of the claim.
Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation
(Ministry of Labour & Employment , Govt. Of India)
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan , 14-Bhikaiji Cama Place, New Dclhi-110066
No. WSU/6(1)2016/Finance Bill 2016/IT/12859 Dated: 23.08.2016
To
All ACCs (Zones)
All RPFC/OICs of
ROs/SROs.
Sub: Deduction of income tax (TDS) on provident fund withdrawal – Instructions thereof.
Ref: (1) Head Office circular No. WSU/6(1)2011/IT/Vol-IV/5931 dt. 21.05.2015 (at Sl. No. 110 of ‘Office orders & circulars’ for 2015-16)
(2) Head Office circular No. WSU/6(1)2016/Finance Bill 2016/IT/4376 dt 30.05.2016 (at Sl. No. 109 of ‘Office orders & circulars’ for 2016-17)
Sir/Madam,
Please refer to the above referred circulars of Head Office.
2. In para 5 of Head Office circular dated 05.2015 cited at (1) above, it was instructed that in the cases of provident, fund withdrawal (Form-19) wherever TDS has to be deducted @10%, the same may be approved on Form-19 by the APFC (Accounts) and wherever TDS @34.608%, it shall be approved on Form-19 by RPFC level officer.
3. The issue has been reviewed at Head Office and it has been decided that henceforth all the cases of TDS (including 10% as well as 34.608%), in the process of settlement of provident fund claims (Form-19), shall be approved by the concerned approver (AO/APFC) of the claim.
4. This has approval of Central F. Commissioner.
Yours faithfully
(Sanjay Kumar)
RPFC-I (F&A)
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…