PF TDS deduction in provident fund claims settlement (Form-19), to be approved by concerned approver (AO/APFC) of the claim.
Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation
(Ministry of Labour & Employment , Govt. Of India)
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan , 14-Bhikaiji Cama Place, New Dclhi-110066
No. WSU/6(1)2016/Finance Bill 2016/IT/12859 Dated: 23.08.2016
To
All ACCs (Zones)
All RPFC/OICs of
ROs/SROs.
Sub: Deduction of income tax (TDS) on provident fund withdrawal – Instructions thereof.
Ref: (1) Head Office circular No. WSU/6(1)2011/IT/Vol-IV/5931 dt. 21.05.2015 (at Sl. No. 110 of ‘Office orders & circulars’ for 2015-16)
(2) Head Office circular No. WSU/6(1)2016/Finance Bill 2016/IT/4376 dt 30.05.2016 (at Sl. No. 109 of ‘Office orders & circulars’ for 2016-17)
Sir/Madam,
Please refer to the above referred circulars of Head Office.
2. In para 5 of Head Office circular dated 05.2015 cited at (1) above, it was instructed that in the cases of provident, fund withdrawal (Form-19) wherever TDS has to be deducted @10%, the same may be approved on Form-19 by the APFC (Accounts) and wherever TDS @34.608%, it shall be approved on Form-19 by RPFC level officer.
3. The issue has been reviewed at Head Office and it has been decided that henceforth all the cases of TDS (including 10% as well as 34.608%), in the process of settlement of provident fund claims (Form-19), shall be approved by the concerned approver (AO/APFC) of the claim.
4. This has approval of Central F. Commissioner.
Yours faithfully
(Sanjay Kumar)
RPFC-I (F&A)
ITAT dismisses claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) beyond Rs. 3 lakhs In a recent judgment, ITAT Ahmedabad has…
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…