Excise/Custom

Clarification regarding payment of Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess by EOU

 

Clarification regarding payment of Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC) by EOU under various situations

Circular No. 07/2021-Customs

 
F.No. DGEP/SEZ/09/2017(Part III)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs
(Directorate General of Export Promotion)
 
New Delhi, dated 22nd February, 2021
 
To,
All Pr. Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners of Customs/ Customs (Prev.),
All Pr. Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners of Central Tax/ Central Excise,
All Pr. Commissioners/ Commissioners of Customs/ Customs (Prev.),
All Pr. Commissioners/ Commissioners of Central Tax and Central Excise,
All Pr. Director Generals/Director Generals under CBIC.
 
Madam/Sir,

Subject: Clarification regarding payment of Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC) by EOU under various situations and amendment to Circular no. 35/2016-Customs dated 29.07.2020 –regarding.

Finance Bill, 2021 (15 of 2021) dated 01.02.2021, vide clause 115 has imposed a duty of customs, to be called Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC), on the import of goods specified in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 at the rate not exceeding the rate of customs duty as specified in the said Schedule, for the purposes of financing the agriculture infrastructure and other development expenditure. The said provision of clause 115 of the Bill has been given immediate effect under the Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931.
 
1.1 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) read with clause 115 of the said bill, Government of India vide Notification No. 11/2021-Customs dated 1st February, 2021 vide Sr. no. 19 read with serial no. 7 of the Annexure to the said notification has fully exempted goods imported by EOUs/EHTP units/STP units (collectively called EOUs) from the AIDC as the goods imported by these units enjoy benefit of exemption from basic customs duty under notification no. 52/2003-Cus dated 31.03.2003.
 
1.2 In case of EOU selling finished goods in DTA, BCD exempted on import of inputs used in such finished goods is to be paid vide Notification No. 59/2017-Customs dated 30.06.2017 [amending by Notification No. 52/2003-Customs dated 31.03.2003]. On payment of such BCD by EOU at the time of clearance of finished goods it is treated as if no exemption of BCD was allowed to the EOU under Notification No. 52/2003-Customs dated 31.03.2003. Once it is deemed that no exemption of BCD on inputs is allowed which were imported under exemption Notification No. 52/2003-Customs dated 31.03.2003, AIDC exemption under Notification no. 11/2021-Customs dated 01.2.2021 also gets denied on such inputs and same is also required to be paid by EOU.
 
1.3 In addition to clearance of goods in DTA there are many situations like clearance of inputs; capital goods; packing material suitable for repeated use such empty cones, bobbins, containers; left over textile fabric or textile material etc. or exit from EOU scheme. In such cases duty/tax of which exemption under Notification No. 52/2003-Customs dated 31.03.2003 was availed at the time of import is required to be paid at the time of clearance. In case of clearance of capital goods, applicable depreciation is allowed for denial of exemption. Unutilized left over textile fabric or textile material is allowed to be cleared into DTA on payment of duty leviable at the time of import but for the exemption on transaction value as if the goods have been manufactured in that unit. Exemption of duty/tax on goods imported under Notification No. 52/2003-Customs dated 31.03.2003 is also denied on account of breach of various conditions of EOU scheme. Once EOU is required to pay back BCD for which exemption was claimed and allowed under Notification No. 52/2003-Customs dated 31.03.2003 at the timeof import then exemption of AIDC, if availed, in all such situations shall also be denied. Thus, EOU shall be required to pay AIDC in the manner of payment of BCD against the goods imported under exemption Notification No. 52/2003-Customs dated 31.03.2003 under various situations.
 
2. EOU/STP/EHTP are required to maintain and also submit digital copy of Form –A to Circular no. 35/2016-Customs dated 29.07.2016, by 10th of month to proper officer, which captures the summary of receipt, removal, returns and balance of imported goods under Notification No. 52/2003-Customs dated 31.03.2003. Copy of Quarterly Performance Report and Annual Performance Reports [QPR/APR] are also required to be submitted to jurisdictional AC/DC of Customs as mandated by DGFT Public Notice no. 36/2015-2020 dated 04.09.218.Though QPR/APR contain details of various activities including revenue contribution by EOUs but these are reflected in consolidated manner and these reports may be a monitoring tool for departmental officers with limitations. However, for effective and monthly monitoring of exemption of duty/taxes availed under Notification No. 52/2003-Customs dated 31.03.2003, the said Form ‘A’is amended and revised Form ‘A’ is annexed herewith. Circular no. 35/2016-Customs dated 29.07.2016 may be treated as amended to above extent.
 
3. Difficulties, if any, may be brought to the notice of Board.
 
4. Hindi version will follow.
 
Encl: -Revised Form ‘A’
 
Yours faithfully,
 
-S/d-
(Saroj Kumar Behera) Additional Director
 

Download Circular Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

2 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

11 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

2 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

3 days ago