Excise/Custom

Duty Drawback Scheme Re-export examination report on shipping bill to be separate, self-contained and explicit on identity and use. Circular No. 16/2016

Duty Drawback Scheme Re-export examination report on shipping bill to be separate, self-contained and explicit on identity and use

Circular No. 16/2016-Customs

F.No. 603/01/2016-DBK
Government of India
Ministry of Finance,
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise & Customs

New Delhi, dated 9th May, 2016

To
Principal Chief Commissioners / Chief Commissioners
Principal Directors General / Directors General
Principal Commissioners/Commissioners,
all under CBEC

Subject: Audit Report No.15/2011-2012, Section 2 – Duty Drawback Scheme: Re-export under section 74 of Customs Act 1962 -regarding

Madam/Sir,

Attention of field formations is drawn to Board’s Circular No.46/2011-Customs dated 20.10.2011 read with Circular No. 35/2013-Customs which strengthened the assessment practice for export under section 74 of the Customs Act 1962 with respect to whether identity of the goods is established or not as the same goods which were earlier imported on payment of duty under the specific import documents, the determination of use with respect to declaration that goods are “unused” and for ensuring compliance with provisions of Rule 5 of the Re-export of Imported Goods (Drawback of Customs Duties) Rules, 1995. The Circular had directed examination of goods and verification of various parameters for identification of goods and required each case of re-export to be dealt by the Asst/Deputy Commissioner of Customs through a speaking and reasoned appealable order. This has the advantage of being also examined by the Commissioner for its legality and propriety.

Based on feedback, Board has noted some issues and to enhance the efficiency of this mechanism it further directs that the examination report on shipping bill must be recorded separately in a self-contained and explicit manner on each of the two aspects of identity and use. The examination report should not be made of phrases that are cryptic, generalised or sweeping in nature such as ‘as per declaration’, ‘in as such condition’, ‘found in order’, ‘found as declared’, ‘goods are same’ etc. Yours faithfully,

(Rajiv Shankar)
OSD (Drawback)
Tel: 23367563

Share

Recent Posts

  • Insurance

Calculation of functional disability depends on victim’s earning capacity in open market – SC

Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Appeal against ITAT shall lie only before High Court within whose jurisdiction AO is situated

Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…

2 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

SC recommends action against Customs Officer who relied upon AI generated fake case laws

Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

7 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

7 days ago