Excise/Custom

Excise duty branded ready made garments retailer exemption on textile articles having retail sale price of less then Rs. 1000

Excise Duty Branded Ready made Garments Retailer Exemption

Circular No. 1031/19/2016-CX

F. No. 332/5/2016-TRU
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue)
Tax Research Unit

New Delhi, 14th of June, 2016

To,
Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners/Principal Commissioners of Central Excise (All); Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners/Principal Commissioners of Customs & Central Excise (All),

Subject: Levy of excise duty on readymade garments and made articles of textiles bearing a brand name or sold under a brand name and having a retail sale price of Rs. 1000 or more – reg.

Sir / Madam,

Representations have been received from the trade regarding the scope of the levy of excise duty on ready made garments and made articles of textiles bearing a brand name or sold under a brand name and having a retail sale price of Rs. 1000 or more in this year’s Budget.

2. The issue raised is whether excise duty would be chargeable on readymade garments or made up articles of textiles which are sold by a retail store which merely affixes the retail sale price on the readymade garments or made up articles of textiles which are purchased by such retail store from the open market.

3. The issue has been examined in the Ministry. The present levy is not on all readymade garments and made ups, and is restricted only to readymade garments and made up articles of textiles bearing a brand name or sold under a brand name and having retail sale price (RSP) of Rs. 1000 or above. Further, to avoid disputes and minimize duty evasion, it has also been provided that affixing a brand name on the product, labeling or relabeling of its containers or repacking from bulk packs to retail packs or the adoption of any other treatment to render the product marketable to the consumer, shall amount to manufacture.

3.1 For this purpose, “Brand name” means a brand name, whether registered or not, that is to say, a name or a mark, such as a symbol monogram, label, signature or invented words or any writing which is used in relation to a product, for the purpose of indicating, or so as to indicate, a connection in the course of trade between the product and some person using such name or mark with or without any indication of the identity of that person.

4. However, such retailer shall not be liable to pay excise duty if:

(a) the retail sale price of such readymade garments or made up articles of textiles is less than Rs. 1000, or

(b) the aggregate value of clearances for home consumption by such person is less than Rs. 1.5 crore in a year [provided aggregate value of clearances during previous financial year was less than Rs. 4 crore].

5. Further, merely because the outlets [shop] of a retailer, from where readymade garments or made ups are sold, has a name, say, M/s XYZ and Sons, the readymade garments or made ups sold from such outlet [shop] cannot be held as branded readymade garments or made ups and become liable to excise duty. Needless to say, deemed manufacture and liability to excise duty will arise only if such retailer affixes a brand name on the readymade garments and affixes a label bearing the RSP on the packages containing the readymade garments of Rs. 1000 or above.

6. Further, it is hereby directed that field formations shall not visit individual retail outlets or retail chains, except based on specific inputs regarding duty evasion and with the approval of the jurisdictional Commissioner or Additional Director General or above.

7. The above position may be brought to the notice of formations under your charge for strict compliance. Difficulties, if any, faced in the implementation of the instructions may be brought to the notice of the Ministry at an early date.

Yours faithfully,

(Devi Prasad Misra)
Technical Officer (TRU)

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago