Excise/Custom

Provisional Custom Clearance of Goods -Unsigned/digital Certificate of Origin to be valid

Provisional Custom Clearance of Goods under India’s Trade Agreements. Digitally signed copy or unsigned copy of Certificate of Origin (CoO) to be valid

Instruction No. 04/2020 -Customs

F. No. 15021/10/2020-ICD (CBEC)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
International Customs Division
*****

Room No. 49, North Block, New Delhi -110001
Dated: 04 May, 2020

To
The Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner of Customs,Ahmedabad/Bengaluru/Delhi/Kolkata/Mumbai–I/Mumbai II/Mumbai–III Zone.
The Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Delhi/Patna/Tiruchirapalli.
The Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax,Bhopal/Bhubaneshwar/Guwahati/Hyderabad/Meerut/ Nagpur/Pune/Thiruvananthpuram/Visakhapatnam.Madam /

Sir,

Subject: Provisional Clearance of Goods under India’s Trade Agreements – regarding

Kind reference is drawn to Circular 18/2020-Customs, dated 11.04.2020, which provides an option to clear goods under preferential tariff claim, in terms of section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962, where a Certificate of Origin (CoO)is not available at the time of filing customs documents.

2. This measure has been taken, keeping in view the restrictions imposed globally, which may lead to a situation wherein an exporter in unable to communicate original CoO to the importer or submits a CoO which is not as per the prescribed format(digitally signed/unsigned).

3. Board has also issued necessary guidelines vide Circular 38/2016-Customs, dated 22.08.2016, prescribing the manner and amount of security based upon class of importer and nature of import. The Circular covers FTAs/PTAs imports under three categories at S.no 5(a), 5(b) and 5(c).

4. In this regard, it is informed that where original hard copy of CoO has not been submitted or only digitally signed copy or unsigned copy of CoO is submitted, same may be treated at par with category as listed at serial no. 5(c) of the Circular 38/2016-Customs, provided that the matter is not covered under 5(a), wherein there is reasonable belief that the it involves mis-declaration of origin/value addition.

5. It is requested that the that officers under your charge be directed to follow these guidelines while implementing Circular 18/2020-Customs.

Yours faithfully

(Mandeep Sangha)
Joint Commissioner (Customs)

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

1 week ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago