Time Limit for production of various certificates by Importers for custom/IGST exemption extended
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2020
G.S.R. 296 (E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) and sub-section (12) of section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 50/2017-Customs, dated the 30th June, 2017, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide, number G.S.R. 785(E), dated the 30th June, 2017, namely:-
In the said notification, in the ANNEXURE, –
(i) in Condition No. 10, in Condition (c), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-“Provided thatthe validity of the said certificate, issued for the financial year 2019-20, upto the period of 31st March, 2020, shall be extended upto 30th September, 2020 for import of unutilised value and quantity of goods specified in the said certificate.”;
(ii) in Condition No. 21, in Condition (c), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-“Provided that the validity of the said certificate, issued for the financial year 2019-20, upto the period of 31st March, 2020, shall be extended upto 30th September, 2020 for import of unutilised value and quantity of item(s) specified in the said certificate.”;
(iii) in Condition No. 28, in Condition (c), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-“Provided that the validity of the said certificate, issued for the financial year 2019-20, upto the period of 31st March, 2020, shall be extended upto 30th September, 2020 for import of unutilised value and quantity of goods specified in the said certificate.”;
(iv) in Condition No. 32, in Condition (c), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-“Provided that the validity of the said certificate, issued for the financial year 2019-20, upto the period of 31st March, 2020, shall be extended upto 30th September, 2020 for import of unutilised value and quantity of goods specified in the said certificate.”;
(v) in Condition No. 33, in Condition (c), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-“Provided that the validity of the said certificate, issued for the financial year 2019-20, upto the period of 31st March, 2020, shall be extended upto 30th September, 2020 for import of unutilised value and quantity of goods specified in the said certificate.”;
(vi) in Condition No. 36, in Condition (b), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-
“Provided that the validity of the said certificate, issued for the financial year 2019-20, upto the period of 31st March, 2020, shall be extended upto 30th September, 2020 for import of unutilised value and quantity of goods specified in the said certificate.”;
(vii) in Condition No. 101, in Condition (c), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-
“Provided that the validity of the said certificate, issued for the financial year 2019-20, upto the period of 31st March, 2020, shall be extended upto 30th September, 2020 for import of unutilised value and quantity of goods specified in the said certificate.”
[F. No. 605/10/2020-DBK]
GOPAL KRISHNA JHA, Director (Drawback)
Note: The principal notification No. 50/2017-Customs, dated the 30th June, 2017 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide,number G.S.R. 785(E), dated the 30th June, 2017 and was last amended by notification No. 01/2020-Customs, dated the 2nd February, 2020, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 61(E), dated the 2nd February, 2020.
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…