Export warehousing facility extended to Ahmedabad Gujarat. Places where warehouses may be established to store excisable goods for export
Circular No. 1051/39/2016-CX
F. NO. 209/10/2013-CX.6
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS
North Block, New Delhi
Dated the 15th of December, 2016
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners of Central Excise (All)
The Director General (All)
Sub: Export warehousing-Extension of facility in Ahmedabad District of Gujarat-reg.
Madam/Sir,
I am directed to refer to Board ‘s Circular No. 581/18/2001-CX dated 29th June, 2001 which, infer alia, specifies conditions. procedures, class of exporters and places under sub-rule (2) of Rule 20 of Central Excise Rules. 2002 for warehousing of excisable goods for the purpose of export . ln paragraph 2(2) of the said Circular.the Board has specified places where warehouses may be established to store excisable goods for export .The Board has received representations from the trade to include Ahmedabad District in the state of Gujarat in the list of places mentioned in the said Circular.
2. The matter has been examined . Board is of the view that extension of the facility of export warehousing to Ahmedabad district in the state of Gujarat would facilitate the trade and Therefore, It has been decided to amend paragraph 2(2) of the Circu lar No. 581/18/2001-CX. dated 29th June, 2001 to include Ahmedabad district in the State of Gujarat. Accordingly, the said paragraph shall now read as follows:
”(2) Places : The warehouses may be established and registered in Bangalore, Kolkata, Chennai Delhi, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Ludhiana, Mumbai, the district of Ahmedabad in the state of Gujarat, the districts of Pune and Raigad in the state of Maharashtra, the district of East Midnapore in the state of West Bengal, the district of Kancheepuram in the state of Tamilnadu, the district of Indore in the state of Madhya Pradesh, the taluka Ankleshwar in the disirict of Bharuch in the state of Gujarat, Navi Mumbai in the district of Thane in the state of Maharashtra , Sholinghur in the district of Vellore in the Slate of Tamil Nadu, Bidadi in the Bangalore Rural District, Karnataka, the district of Thiruvallur in the state of Tamil Nadu, the district of Gautam Budh Nagar in the state of Uttar Pradesh, the district of Nagpur in the state of Maharashtra, Tehsil of Tijara of Alwar district in the state of Rajasthan and Bhuj Taluka of Kutch District in the state of Gujarat.”
3. The field formations may suitably be Receipt of this Circular may please be acknowledged. Hindi version will follow.
(Shankar Prasad Sarma)
Under Secretary to the Govt. of lndia
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…