Excise

Export warehousing facility extended to Ahmedabad Gujarat. Places where warehouses may be established to store excisable goods for export

Export warehousing facility extended to Ahmedabad Gujarat. Places where warehouses may be established to store excisable goods for export

Circular No. 1051/39/2016-CX

F. NO. 209/10/2013-CX.6
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS

North  Block, New Delhi
Dated the  15th of December, 2016

To,
The Principal Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners of Central Excise (All)
The Director General (All)

Sub: Export warehousing-Extension of facility in Ahmedabad  District of Gujarat-reg.

Madam/Sir,

I am directed to refer to Board ‘s Circular No. 581/18/2001-CX dated 29th June, 2001 which, infer alia, specifies conditions. procedures, class of exporters and places under sub­-rule (2) of Rule 20 of Central Excise Rules. 2002 for warehousing of excisable goods for the purpose of export . ln paragraph 2(2) of the said Circular.the Board has specified places where warehouses may be established to store excisable goods for export .The Board has received representations from the trade to include Ahmedabad District in the state of Gujarat in the list of places mentioned in the said Circular.

2. The matter has been examined . Board is of the view that extension of the facility of export warehousing to Ahmedabad district in the state of Gujarat would facilitate the trade and Therefore, It has been decided to amend paragraph 2(2) of the Circu lar No. 581/18/2001-CX. dated 29th June, 2001 to include Ahmedabad district in the State of Gujarat. Accordingly, the said paragraph shall now read as follows:

”(2) Places : The warehouses may be established and registered in Bangalore, Kolkata, Chennai Delhi, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Ludhiana, Mumbai, the district of Ahmedabad in the state of Gujarat, the districts of Pune and Raigad in the state of Maharashtra, the district of East Midnapore in the state of West Bengal, the district of Kancheepuram in the state of Tamilnadu, the district of Indore in the state of  Madhya Pradesh, the taluka Ankleshwar in the disirict of Bharuch in the state of Gujarat, Navi Mumbai in the district of Thane in the state of Maharashtra , Sholinghur in the district of Vellore in the Slate of Tamil Nadu, Bidadi in the Bangalore Rural District, Karnataka, the district of Thiruvallur in the state of Tamil Nadu, the district of Gautam Budh Nagar in the state of Uttar Pradesh, the district of Nagpur in the state of Maharashtra, Tehsil of Tijara of Alwar district in the state of Rajasthan and Bhuj Taluka of Kutch District in the state of Gujarat.”

3. The field formations may suitably be Receipt of this Circular may please be acknowledged. Hindi version will follow.

(Shankar Prasad Sarma)
Under Secretary to the Govt. of lndia

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Requirement of DIN referencing in Income Tax notices etc. and exceptions

CBDT has issued revised requirements of DIN referencing in Income Tax notices etc. and exceptions Section 292B of Income Tax…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Applicability of deeming fiction u/s 50C when property purchased & sold within same year

When property purchased and sold within same year both sale and purchase price has to be adopted by applying same…

1 day ago
  • ICAI

ICAI defers the effective date of Standard on Quality Management SQM1 and SQM2

ICAI defers the mandatory effective date of SQM 1 and SQM 2 The Council of ICAI, at its 451st Meeting…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Addition based on letter of District Magistrate not recovered during search deleted

Addition deleted as it was made on the basis of letter of District Magistrate which not recovered during the search…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT clarification on threshold for TDS on interest by banks under Income Tax Act 2025

Banks not required to deduct TDS under Income Tax Act 2025 on interest income below threshold limit - CBDT clarification …

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Allegations of delay in TDS deposit & person responsible must be tested at trial

Allegations of delay in TDS deposit, role of person responsible are disputed factual matters which must be tested at trial…

2 days ago