Excise

Revised jurisdiction for filing excise revision application in form EA-8

Revised jurisdiction for filing excise revision application form EA-8. Central Excise (Appeals) Amendment Rules 2017

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)

Notification No. 27/2017-Central Excise (N.T.)

New Delhi, the 23rd November, 2017

G.S.R. 1442(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 37 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules to amend the Central Excise (Appeals) Rules, 2001, namely:—

1. (1) These rules may be called the Central Excise (Appeals) Amendment Rules, 2017.
    (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Central Excise (Appeals) Rules, 2001 for rule 10, the following shall be substituted, namely:—

“10(1) The revision application shall be filed in form E.A.-8 before the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner (Revisionary Authority) as per the jurisdiction specified in column (3) of the table below:—

TABLE

S.No. Office

Jurisdiction to hear Revision Applications against Commissioner (Appeals) Order (State-wise and UnionTerritory wise)

(1)

(2)

(3)

1 Principal Commissioner (RA) and ex-officio Additional Secretary to the Government of India- Delhi Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Chandigarh, Uttar Pradesh, Delhi, Haryana, Uttarakhand, Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Sikkim, Odisha, Rajasthan, Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura.
2 Principal Commissioner (RA) and ex-officio Additional Secretary to the Government of India – Mumbai Principal Commissioner (RA) and ex-officio Additional Secretary to the Government of India – Mumbai

2. The Board shall pass an order specifying therein an address, phone numbers and other details relating to the Revisionary Authority.

3. The revision application shall be deemed to have been submitted to the said Principal Commissioner (Revisionary Authority) on the date on which it is received in the office of Revisionary Authority.”

[F. No. 116/33/2017-CX 3]
SHANKAR PRASAD SARMA, Under Secy.

Note : The principal notification No. 32/2001-Central Excise (N.T.), dated the 21st June, 2001 was published vide G.S.R. 446(E), dated the 21st June, 2001 and was last amended vide notification No. 23/2014- Central Excise (NT) dated 6th August, 2014 G.S.R. 566(E), dated the 6th August, 2014.

Share

View Comments

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non issue of notice u/s 143(2) for even belated ITR filed u/s 148 makes assessment void ab initio

Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…

6 days ago
  • Insurance

Calculation of functional disability depends on victim’s earning capacity in open market – SC

Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Appeal against ITAT shall lie only before High Court within whose jurisdiction AO is situated

Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…

1 week ago
  • Excise/Custom

SC recommends action against Customs Officer who relied upon AI generated fake case laws

Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

2 weeks ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 weeks ago