FCRA

Retrospective amendment in Foreign Contribution Regulation Act 2010-Who will be benefited?

Retrospective amendment in Foreign Contribution Regulation Act 2010-Who will be benefited?

Political parties cannot receive contribution from any foreign source as defined under Clause (c) of Section 2 of the FCRA, 1976.  Section 29 B of the Representation of the Peoples Act, 1951 also prohibits political parties from receiving foreign contributions.

Under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, “foreign contribution” means the donation, delivery or transfer of specified articles, currency, security etc. by any foreign source.

Further  sub-clause (vi) of clause (j) of sub-section (1) of section 2 provides that foreign source include a company within the meaning of the Companies Act, 1956, and more than one-half of the nominal value of its share capital is held, either singly or in the aggregate, by one or more of the following, namely:-

(a) the Government of a foreign country or territory;
(b) the citizens of a foreign country or territory;
(c) corporations incorporated in a foreign country or territory;
(d) trusts, societies or other associations of individuals (whether incorporated or not), formed or registered in a foreign country or territory;
(e) foreign company;

The proviso inserted by Finance Act, 2016 provided that where the nominal value of share capital is within the limits specified for foreign investment under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, or the rules or regulations made thereunder, then, notwithstanding the nominal value of share capital of a company being more than one-half of such value at the time of making the contribution, such company shall not be a foreign source.

However, the Finance Bill, 2018 seeks to amend Section 236 of the Finance Act, 2016 to bring the said amendment with effect from the 5th August, 1976 the date of commencement of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976.

The main objective of the proposed amendment as stated by the Minister of State for Home Affairs, Shri Kiren Rijiju in written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha today is, to ensure that the definition of ‘foreign source’ remains consistent with the FDI Policy of the Government of India; and provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014

However, it can not be overlooked that in 2014, both the ruling BJP and the Congress have been held guilty by the Delhi High Court for receiving foreign funds from two subsidiaries of a U.K. based company. In 2016, the Supreme Court had dismissed the SLPs filed by the Congress and the BJP. The retrospective amendment will directly benefit both the political parties along with others.

Share

Recent Posts

  • consumer-protection

Compensation to borrower upheld as bank did not verify construction progress before loan disbursals to builder

Bank was liable to pay compensation to borrower as it did not verify the progress of construction before loan disbursals…

10 hours ago
  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002

No timeline mentioned in PMLA to forward arrest order & material in possession to Adjudicating Authority

No timeline mentioned in PMLA to forward the arrest order and the material in possession to the Adjudicating Authority. It…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Release of seized assets if mandatory on completion of 120 days? Question referred to Larger Bench

Whether the release of seized assets is mandatory upon completion of 120 days –High Court refers the case to a…

1 day ago
  • Uncategorized

EPFO Extends date of filing of new ECR for the wage month September to 31/10/2026

EPFO Extends date of filing of new ECR for the wage month September to 31st October 2026 Taking into account…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Earlier acceptance is relevant evidence in evaluating subsequent allegation of fictitious investment

Earlier acceptance of investment is a relevant evidence in evaluating subsequent allegation that investments were fictitious from inception – High…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

A bald statement recorded during survey can not be basis for any addition

A bald statement recorded during survey would not in itself be a foundation for any addition - ITAT In a…

4 days ago