FCRA

Retrospective amendment in Foreign Contribution Regulation Act 2010-Who will be benefited?

Retrospective amendment in Foreign Contribution Regulation Act 2010-Who will be benefited?

Political parties cannot receive contribution from any foreign source as defined under Clause (c) of Section 2 of the FCRA, 1976.  Section 29 B of the Representation of the Peoples Act, 1951 also prohibits political parties from receiving foreign contributions.

Under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, “foreign contribution” means the donation, delivery or transfer of specified articles, currency, security etc. by any foreign source.

Further  sub-clause (vi) of clause (j) of sub-section (1) of section 2 provides that foreign source include a company within the meaning of the Companies Act, 1956, and more than one-half of the nominal value of its share capital is held, either singly or in the aggregate, by one or more of the following, namely:-

(a) the Government of a foreign country or territory;
(b) the citizens of a foreign country or territory;
(c) corporations incorporated in a foreign country or territory;
(d) trusts, societies or other associations of individuals (whether incorporated or not), formed or registered in a foreign country or territory;
(e) foreign company;

The proviso inserted by Finance Act, 2016 provided that where the nominal value of share capital is within the limits specified for foreign investment under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, or the rules or regulations made thereunder, then, notwithstanding the nominal value of share capital of a company being more than one-half of such value at the time of making the contribution, such company shall not be a foreign source.

However, the Finance Bill, 2018 seeks to amend Section 236 of the Finance Act, 2016 to bring the said amendment with effect from the 5th August, 1976 the date of commencement of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976.

The main objective of the proposed amendment as stated by the Minister of State for Home Affairs, Shri Kiren Rijiju in written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha today is, to ensure that the definition of ‘foreign source’ remains consistent with the FDI Policy of the Government of India; and provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014

However, it can not be overlooked that in 2014, both the ruling BJP and the Congress have been held guilty by the Delhi High Court for receiving foreign funds from two subsidiaries of a U.K. based company. In 2016, the Supreme Court had dismissed the SLPs filed by the Congress and the BJP. The retrospective amendment will directly benefit both the political parties along with others.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago