FCRA

Validity for receiving/utilising foreign contribution by application of prior permission

Validity period for receiving and utilising the foreign contribution through an application of prior permission

Under the FCRA, 2010, every person having a definite cultural, economic, educational, religious or social programme may, if it is not registered with the Central Government under section 11(1), accept any foreign contribution only after obtaining the prior permission of the Ministry of Home affairs by making an application in the prescribed format and such prior permission shall be valid for the specific activities or projects for which it is obtained and from the specific source

The Central Government has issued a Public Notice directing that validity period for receiving and utilising the foreign contribution through an application of prior permission shall be as follows:

(a) The validity period for receiving foreign contribution shall be 3 years from the date of approval of the application for prior permission.

(b) The validity period for utilising the said foreign contribution shall be 4 years from the date of approval of the application for prior permission.

Further, in respect of prior permission applications which have already been approved and where the remaining period of the approved project/ activity in the prior permission is more than 3 years, the above time limit shall be reckoned from the date of issue of this order instead of the date of approval of the application for prior permission.

It has been clarified that notwithstanding the provisions at para 2 & 3 above, the competent authority in the Ministry of Home Affairs may allow for extension in the above [mentioned validity period for an association/organisation on case to case basis, based on the merits of the case.

Any receipt or utilisation of the foreign contribution beyond the above said time limits shall be a violation of FCRA, 2010 and in case of any violation, necessary punitive action shall be taken.

Download FCRA Public Notice Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Prevention of Corruption Act

CBDT Instruction can not absolve persons to explain source of gold within limits specified – SC

Mere CBDT Instructions cannot absolve individuals of their obligation to explain the source and nature of their gold holdings, even…

14 hours ago
  • ICSI

Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations December 2026. Last date 16.11.2026

Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations December 2026 ICSI has invited interested members to enroll as General Observers for…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT address some important issues relating to deduction u/s 80IA

ITAT answers some important and inter-related issues relating to deduction u/s 80IA In a recent judgment, ITAT has dealt with…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Mere carry forward of loss can not be denied for belated return – ITAT

Carry forward of loss can not be denied for belated return, it is only the set off in subsequent year…

2 weeks ago
  • Income Tax

Sales duly recorded in books & VAT returns, can’t be held bogus without cogent adverse material

Where sales are duly recorded in books and VAT returns, to treat it bogus sales, AO must bringing cogent adverse…

2 weeks ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT allows Diwali expenses incurred by assessee as business expenses

Expenses to celebrate Diwali with staff creates a goodwill and, therefore amounts to expenses incurred for the purpose of business…

2 weeks ago