FCRA

Validity period for receiving & utilising foreign contribution by prior permission

Validity period for receiving and utilising the foreign contribution through an application of prior permission

Under the FCRA, 2010, every person having a definite cultural, economic, educational, religious or social programme may, if it is not registered with the Central Government under section 1 1(1), accept any foreign contribution only after obtaining the prior permission of the Ministry of Home affairs by making an application in the prescribed format and such prior permission shall be valid for the specific activities or projects for which it is obtained and from the specific source

The Central Government has directed that validity period for receiving and utilising the foreign contribution through an application of prior permission shall be as follows:

(a) The Validity period for receiving foreign contribution shall be 3 years from the date of approval of the application for prior permission.

(b) The validity period for utilising the said foreign contribution shall be 4 years from the date of approval of the application for prior permission.

Further, it has been directed in respect of prior permission applications which have already been approved and where the remaining period of the approved project/ activity in the prior permission is more than 3 years, the above time limit shall be reckoned from the date of issue of this order instead of the date of approval of the application for prior permission.

Notwithstanding the above provisions , the competent authority in the Ministry of Home Affairs may allow for extension in the above mentioned validity period for an association/organisation on case to case basis, based on the merits of the case.

Any receipt or utilisation of the foreign contribution beyond the above said time limits shall be a violation of FCRA, 2010 and in case of any violation, necessary punitive action shall be taken.

Download FCRA Public Notice Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • consumer-protection

Compensation to borrower upheld as bank did not verify construction progress before loan disbursals to builder

Bank was liable to pay compensation to borrower as it did not verify the progress of construction before loan disbursals…

10 hours ago
  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002

No timeline mentioned in PMLA to forward arrest order & material in possession to Adjudicating Authority

No timeline mentioned in PMLA to forward the arrest order and the material in possession to the Adjudicating Authority. It…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Release of seized assets if mandatory on completion of 120 days? Question referred to Larger Bench

Whether the release of seized assets is mandatory upon completion of 120 days –High Court refers the case to a…

1 day ago
  • Uncategorized

EPFO Extends date of filing of new ECR for the wage month September to 31/10/2026

EPFO Extends date of filing of new ECR for the wage month September to 31st October 2026 Taking into account…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Earlier acceptance is relevant evidence in evaluating subsequent allegation of fictitious investment

Earlier acceptance of investment is a relevant evidence in evaluating subsequent allegation that investments were fictitious from inception – High…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

A bald statement recorded during survey can not be basis for any addition

A bald statement recorded during survey would not in itself be a foundation for any addition - ITAT In a…

4 days ago