Finance Ministry

Banking Laws Amendment Bill 2024 – Proposed amendments to auditor’s remuneration

Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill 2024 – Amendments related to auditor’s remuneration to be decided by bank

The Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill 2024  has bene presented in Lok Sabha. It proposes certain amendments to provisions related to auditor’s remuneration.

As per Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill 2024, it seeks inter alia, to improve governance standards, provide consistency in reporting by banks to the Reserve Bank of India, ensure better protection for depositors and investors, improve audit quality in public sector banks, bring customer convenience in respect of nominations and to provide for increase in the tenure of the directors in co-operative banks.

Among others, it is proposed to amend section 41 of the State Bank of India Act, 1955, section 10 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 and section 10 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980, so as to provide discretion to public sector banks in the matter of remuneration of auditors.

The relevant clause of the Bill with respect to proposed amendments in auditor’s remuneration are as under:

Act Existing clause Amended clause
The State Bank of India Act, 1955. Amendment to section 41(2) The auditors shall receive such remuneration as the Reserve Bank may fix in consultation with the Central Government The auditors shall receive such remuneration as the State Bank may fix

The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970. Amendment to Section 10(2)

Every auditor of a corresponding new bank shall be a person who is qualified to act as an auditor of a company under section 226 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), and shall receive such remuneration as the Reserve Bank may fix in consultation with the Central Government Every auditor of a corresponding new bank shall be a person who is qualified to act as an auditor of a company under 141 of the Companies Act, 2013 and shall receive such remuneration as the corresponding new bank may fix

The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980. Amendment to section 10(2)

Every auditor of a corresponding new bank shall be a person who is qualified to act as an auditor of a company under section 226 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), and shall receive such remuneration as the Reserve Bank may fix in consultation with the Central Government Every auditor of a corresponding new bank shall be a person who is qualified to act as an auditor of a company under 141 of the Companies Act, 2013 and shall receive such remuneration as the corresponding new bank may fix

Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill 2024 Click here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago