Extension of timelines under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) 2019 for the persons in Jammu and Kashmir and UT of Ladakh
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS)
Order No 1/2020-SVLDRS, 2019
New Delhi, the 13th November, 2020
G.S.R. 715(E).––WHEREAS, sub-section (1) of section 127 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019 (23 of 2019) (hereafter in this Order referred to as the said Act) provides that where the amount estimated to be payable by the declarant, as estimated by the designated committee, equals the amount declared by the declarant, then, the designated committee shall issue in electronic form, a statement, indicating the amount payable by the declarant, on or before the 31st day of May, 2020;
AND WHEREAS, sub-section (2) of section 127 of the said Act provides that where the amount estimated to be payable by the declarant, as estimated by the designated committee, exceeds the amount declared by the declarant, then, the designated committee shall issue in electronic form, an estimate of the amount payable by the declarant on or before the 1st day of May, 2020;
AND WHEREAS, sub-section (4) of section 127 of the said Act provides that after hearing the declarant, a statement in electronic form indicating the amount payable by the declarant, shall be issued on or before the 31st day of May, 2020;
AND WHEREAS, sub-section (5) of section 127 of the said Act provides that the declarant shall pay electronically through internet banking, the amount payable as indicated in the statement issued by the designated committee, on or before the 30th day of June, 2020;
AND WHEREAS, the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 (34 of 2019) came into force with effect from the 31st October, 2019 and for considerable period during which the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 was open for filing of declaration from Ist September, 2019 till 15th January, 2020, the internet services were disrupted in the Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir and Union Territory of Ladakh, and these extraordinary circumstances created an impediment in the implementation of the provisions of the said Scheme in so far as the taxpayers in these Union Territories could not avail the benefits of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.
NOW, THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of the section 134 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019 (23 of 2019), the Central Government, hereby makes the following Order, to remove the difficulties, namely:––
1. Short title.––This Order may be called the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2020.
2. It is provided that notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of sub-section (1), (2), (4) & (5) of section 127 of the said Act and the rules, namely the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme Rules, 2019, made under the said Act, for the persons in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and Union Territory of Ladakh, in respect of cases eligible under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, as on the 15th January, 2020, following timelines are hereby provided:-
a. The last date for filing of the declaration referred to in sub-rule (1) of rule 3 of the said rules shall be on or before the 31st December, 2020;
b. The last date of issuance of statement under sub-section (1) and (4) of section 127 of the said Act shall be on or before the 31st January, 2021;
c. The last date of issuance of estimate of amount payable under sub-section (2) of section 127 of the said Act shall be on or before the 15th January, 2021;
d. The last date for payment of dues by declarant under sub-section (5) of section 127 of the said Act shall be on or before the 28th February, 2021.
[F.No.267/78/2019-CX.8(Pt. III)]
MAZID KHAN, Under Secy.
Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…
High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…
Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…
Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…
Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…
CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…