Finance Ministry

Non Productivity Linked Bonus 2015-16 to Central Government Employees in Group-C and D and Non-gazetted employees in Group-B

Non Productivity Linked Bonus 2015-16 to Central Government Employees in Group-C and D and Non-gazetted employees in Group-B equivalent to 30 days

No. 7/24/2007/E-III (A)
Government  of India
Ministry of Finance
Department  of  Expenditure ( E III-A Branch)
*****

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

North Block,New Delhi

Subject: Grant of Non-Productivity Linked Bonus (ad-hoc bonus) to Central Government Employees for the year 2015-16 .

The undersigned is directed to convey the sanction of the President to the grant of Non-Productivity Linked Bonus (Ad-hoc Bonus) equivalent to 30 days emoluments for the accounting year 2015-16 to the Central Government employees in Groups ‘C’ and ‘D’ and all non-gazetted employees in Group ‘B’, who are not covered by any Productivity Linked Bonus Scheme. The calculation ceiling for payment of ad-hoc Bonus under these orders shall be monthly emoluments of Rs. 7000/- , as revised w .e.f 01/04/2014 vide OM No. 7/4/2014-E.III(A) ,  dated  29th August , 2016 .   The payment of ad-hoc  Bonus under these orders will also be admissible to the eligible employees of Central Para Military Forces and Armed Forces. The orders will be deemed to be extended to the employees of Union Territory Administration which follow the Central Government pattern of emoluments and are not covered by any other bonus or ex-gratia scheme .

2.  The benefit will be admissible subject to the following terms and conditions :-

(i) Only those employees who were in service as on 3.2016 and have rendered at least six months of continuous service during the year 2015- 16 will be eligible for payment under these orders. Pro-rata payment will be admissible to the eligible employees for period of continuous service during the year from six months to a full year , the eligibility period being taken in terms of number of months of service (rounded off to the nearest number of months) ;

(ii) The quantum of Non-PLB (ad-hoc bonus) will be worked out on the basis of average emoluments/calculation ceiling whichever is lower . To calculate Non­ PLB (Ad-hoc bonus) for one day , the average emoluments in a year will be divided by 4 (average number of days in a month) . This will , thereafter , be multiplied by the number of days of bonus granted. To illustrate , taking the calculation ceiling of monthly emoluments of Rs. 7000 (where actual average emoluments  exceed  Rs. 7000) ,  Non-PLB  (Ad-hoc  Bonus)  for  thirty  days would work out to Rs. 7000×30/30.4=Rs.6907.89 (rounded off to Rs.6908/-).

(iii) The casual labour who have worked in offices following a 6 days week for at least 240 days for each year for 3 years or more (206 days in each year for 3 years or more in the case of offices observing 5 day week), will be eligible for this Non-PLB (Ad-hoc Bonus) The amount of Non-PLB (ad-hoc bonus) payable will be (Rs.1200×30/30.4  i.e.Rs .1184.21  (rounded  off  to Rs. 1184/-).  In cases where the actual emoluments fall below Rs.1200/- p.m., the amount will be calculated on actual monthly emoluments.

(iv) All payments under these orders will be rounded off to the nearest rupee.

(v) The clarificatory  orders  issued  vide  this  Ministry’s  OM  F.14  (10)-E. Coord/88 dated 4 .10.1988, as amended from time to time , would hold good .

3. The expenditure on this account will be debitable to the respective Heads to which the pay and allowances of these employees are debited .

4. The expenditure to be incurred on account of Non-PLB (Ad-hoc Bonus) is to be met from within the sanctioned budget provision of concerned Ministries/Departments for the current year .

5. In so far as the persons serving in the Indian Audit and Accounts Department are concerned , these orders are issued in consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.

 

(Amar Nath Singh)
Director

 

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

2 days ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

4 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

5 days ago
  • arbitration

Limitation u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commences on disposal of application u/s 33 by Arbitral Tribunal – SC

Limitation for filing application u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commence from date on which application u/s 33 is disposed of…

1 week ago