Finance Ministry

Travelling Allowance TA claim by family of deceased employees beyond one year period of the death of the employee

Travelling Allowance TA claim by family of deceased employees beyond one year period of the death of the employee-Applicability of provision below SR-147

No. 19016/1/2015-E.IV
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department  of Expenditure
***

North Block, New Delhi

Dated the 21st December, 2016

Office Memorandum

Sub:- Applicability of provision below SR-147 to the family of deceased Govt. servant in special circumstances- clarification regarding.

Various references are being received in this Department seeking clarification from this Department as to whether Rule below SR-148 for admitting Travelling Allowance (TA) claim by family of deceased employees beyond one year period of the death of the employee is also covered under Goi decision 2(iii) below Rule SR-147 which provides that ‘TA to Central Government servant  on retirement may be availed · of by a Government servant who is eligible for it, at any time during his leave preparatory to retirement, or within one year of the date of his retirement and powers to extend the time-limit of one year will be exercised by the Administrative Ministries/ Departments with the approval of the FA concerned, in individual cases attendant with special circumstances.’

2. The matter has been considered in  this Department  and  it has been decided that the above provision below SR-147 for extension of time limit of one year with the approval of FA of the concerned Ministry, will also be applicable in case of family of the deceased  servant.

3. This is issued with the approval of Joint Secretary (Personnel).

Nirmala Dev
Deputy Secretary (EG)

Copy to:- All Ministries/Departments (As per list)

Download Clarification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • consumer-protection

Compensation to borrower upheld as bank did not verify construction progress before loan disbursals to builder

Bank was liable to pay compensation to borrower as it did not verify the progress of construction before loan disbursals…

18 hours ago
  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002

No timeline mentioned in PMLA to forward arrest order & material in possession to Adjudicating Authority

No timeline mentioned in PMLA to forward the arrest order and the material in possession to the Adjudicating Authority. It…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Release of seized assets if mandatory on completion of 120 days? Question referred to Larger Bench

Whether the release of seized assets is mandatory upon completion of 120 days –High Court refers the case to a…

2 days ago
  • Uncategorized

EPFO Extends date of filing of new ECR for the wage month September to 31/10/2026

EPFO Extends date of filing of new ECR for the wage month September to 31st October 2026 Taking into account…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Earlier acceptance is relevant evidence in evaluating subsequent allegation of fictitious investment

Earlier acceptance of investment is a relevant evidence in evaluating subsequent allegation that investments were fictitious from inception – High…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

A bald statement recorded during survey can not be basis for any addition

A bald statement recorded during survey would not in itself be a foundation for any addition - ITAT In a…

5 days ago