GST

Arrest under GST Act-High courts to keep in mind recent SLP dismissal, says Supreme Court

Arrest under GST Act-Supreme Court says High courts have to keep in mind the recent dismissal of SLP by it on the subject. Position in law to be clarified

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2976 (2019) (05) SC

The other day the Hon’ble Supreme Court had dismissed the SLP filed by the Petitioners against the judgment passed by the High Court declining to grant stay on arrest under GST Act.

Please note that in the above said case, the issue before the High Court was not if the arrest under GST Act can be made without First Information Report  (FIR)? but the real issue was whether Article 226 can be used as a substitute to section 438 Cr.P.C?

However in a similar case, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had admitted the SLP filed by the Union of India against the order passed by another High Court granting relief to the assessee and directing the GST authorities not to take coercive action against the Petitioner. 

While admitting the bunch of the SLPs on the similar issues, the Apex Court observed that as different High Courts of the country have taken divergent views in the matter, the position in law should be clarified by it.

In all the SLPs filed by the Government, the accused-respondents had been granted the privilege of pre-arrest bail by the High Courts. However, rhe Hon’ble Supreme Court, at this stage, declined to interfere with the same.

However, the Hon’ble Supreme Court clarified that the High Courts while entertaining such request in future, will keep in mind that the Apex Court had dismissed the special leave petition filed against the judgment and order of a High Court in a similar matter, wherein the High Court had taken a view contrary to what has been held by the High Court in the present cases.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court has directed the cases be listed before a full Bench of three Judges.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

1 week ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago